Hobbs Act

Timeline of Official Acts vs. Federal Nomination Milestones

A Pattern of Racketeering, Extortion, and Quid Pro Quo

Date	Judge Smith’s Federal Milestones	Official Acts & Extorted Bribe Payments
12/21/2006	The Originating Act	Judge Smith conducts an ex parte hearing for his former partner/client. He issues an Order for a guardian appointment while concealing the ruled-out ICD-9 MR317 diagnosis from the record.
07/13/2011	Federal Application Period	Smith presides over a guardianship reappointment for Lisa Spitale (arranged by his former partner) just before formally applying for the Federal bench.
03/23/2012	Application Processing	Smith grants “Special Relief” to Guardian Spitale, diverting Emilie’s summer vacation from the Plaintiff to enterprise contractor LEHIGH.
07/23/2012	Vetting Period	ACT OF VIOLENCE: During the time-frame Smith carved out for LEHIGH, Emilie suffers repeated, documented cigarette burns. Deputy Gretchen Kraemer (Smith’s associate) refuses to investigate, ensuring a “clean” FBI background check.
02/06/2013	Nomination Pending	THE COERCIVE INSTRUMENT: Emilie is assaulted in a parking lot by LEHIGH staff; a cigarette is extinguished on her forehead. She is infected with an STD (Scabies).
08/01/2013	OFFICIAL NOMINATION	President Obama formally nominates Edward G. Smith to the U.S. District Court.
08/07/2013	Post-Nomination Payment	Six days after the nomination, the enterprise re-arms the weapon: Mother DeRaymond procures high-potency immunosuppressants to cultivate Norwegian Scabies on Emilie.
08/12/2013	Confirmation Vetting	ATTEMPTED MURDER: LEHIGH forces Emilie (with open skin fissures and a compromised immune system) to clean animal cages, risking fatal septic shock.
03/26/2014	FEDERAL APPOINTMENT	Edward G. Smith is appointed as a United States District Judge for the Eastern District of PA.
03/27/2014	The “Day After” Payment	PHARMACOLOGICAL MAIMING: One day after Smith’s appointment, the prescription pattern breaks. Emilie is administered a “chemical bomb” (Bupropion/Risperidone), causing seizures and permanent brain damage.
08/17/2014	Article III Tenure	KIDNAPPING: 144 days into Smith’s federal tenure, Spitale uses her void ab initio authority to permanently sever all interstate contact between the Plaintiff and his daughter.
02/06/2015	Continuity of Scheme	Spitale perjures herself before Judge Zito to obtain a permanent no-contact order, converting a violent kidnapping into a court-enforced prohibition.

The Architecture of Corruption: Four Key Ex Parte Meetings
The Coordination between Attorney Raymond DeRaymond and Judge Edward Smith

The following four unilateral hearings were arranged by Attorney Raymond DeRaymond before his former law partner and his client Mother DeRaymond, Judge Edward Smith’s former lawyer client. These meetings were the mechanical “engine” of the enterprise, designed first to initiate the robbery of educational funds and later to secure the “payment” of the victim’s permanent silence. McDonnell v. United States, 579 U.S. 550 (2016)

Phase I: The Robbery (2006)

These meetings were designed to hijack a $255,000 Federal settlement obtained by the Plaintiff and install the enterprises Gatekeeper guardian.

1. Ex Parte Hearing One: May 12, 2006
   • Attorney Ray DeRaymond sued for total custody of plaintiffs’ daughter ex parte before Judge Edward Smith immediately after Plaintiff won a $200,000 educational award for his daughter and just before the PA State Appeals Panel No. 1727 added an additional $55,000 to the award, confirming Emilie’s diagnosis as PDD NOS, specifically ruling out mental retardation ICD-9 MR317 promoted by DeRaymond and the District.
     
     
   • The Official Act: Judge Edward Smith ordered a Child Custody Conference. This established the foundation to divert the $255,000 educational trust to enterprise contractors. Exhibit 12.
     
     
2. Ex Parte Hearing Two: December 21, 2006
   • The QUID. DeRaymond opened an Emergency Petition for a guardian before Judge Smith, arranged the same day a Federal Settlement Conference was ordered to enforce the $255,000 educational award and Emilie’s PDD NOS diagnosis. Judge Smith was attorney DeRaymond’s former law partner, his client, mother and school teacher Amy DeRaymond was Judge Edward Smith’s former client.
     
     
   • The Official Act: Judge Smith issued a Show Cause order predicated on the ruled-out ICD-9 MR317 diagnosis, which he personally concealed from the court record to ensure the appointment of Lisa Spitale offending:
     – 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(2);
     – 20 U.S.C. § 1415(j) Pendency placement;
     – 18 U.S.C. § 1346;
     – Susquenita School District v. Raelee S, 96 F.3d 78 ( 3d Cir. 1996 );
     – McDonnell v. United States, 579 U.S. (2016).
     
     
     The Operational Fraud: Money Laundering & Perjury:
     
   • This section is the “bridge” of the conspiracy. It proves that while the courts were being told one story (PDD-NOS/Asperger’s), the Enterprise was billing the government for another (the fraudulent MR317) to keep the money flowing to their preferred contractor.
   • They utilized Medicaid Fraud (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b) to fund the scheme while committing Frauds upon the Court to prevent the Plaintiff from stopping it.
     
     2006–2010 Fraudulent Medicaid Billing:
     09/25/2006, 01/11/2007, 01/14/2008, 2009, 2010 Mother Amy DeRaymond signed MH/MR Service Forms directing illegal, Medicaid-funded business to District contractor LEHIGH. The billing used the ICD-9 MR317 diagnosis—the very diagnosis federal and state panels had specifically ruled out. Doc. 274, 275
     
     12/15/2007 The Federal Settlement Fraud:
     Guardian Lisa Spitale signed the $255,000 Federal Settlement (Doc. 39-1). As a court-appointed fiduciary, she omitted the material fact that Emilie was simultaneously being treated for the “ruled-out” MR317 diagnosis by LEHIGH on school grounds. This was a direct fraud upon the Federal Court.
     
     03/14/2008 Manufactured Medical Record:
     Federal Guardian Romberger commissioned a report from Dr. Richard Hess that excluded all mention of the MR317 diagnosis being billed to Medicaid. This “clean” report allowed the Enterprise to maintain a legal facade while the illegal billing continued behind the scenes.
     Exhibit 13 
     
     05/17/2010 Perjury Before Judge Koury:
     Under oath, Mother DeRaymond testified that Emilie’s only diagnosis was PDD-NOS. This was a blatant falsehood; at the very moment she spoke, she was actively signing MH/MR forms for the fraudulent MR317 diagnosis to ensure LEHIGH continued to receive payment. Doc. 245
     
     08/27/2010 The Asperger’s Smokescreen
     & Diversion of Funds:
     Federal Guardian Moore utilized law firm letterhead to block Emilie’s college matriculation, falsely claiming Emilie was being enrolled with LEHIGH due to “Asperger’s.” Conspiracy of Silence: While Moore and Romberger had the legal responsibility to approve all treatments, they conspired with DeRaymond by allowing her to sign for the MR317 diagnosis. They knowingly utilized Emilie’s $255,000 college fund to pay for services predicated on a diagnosis they publicly denied but privately facilitated. Sending the corpus of the corrupt payments to LEHIGH from Emilie’s $255,000 college trust. Doc. 309
     
     08/27/2010 The Completion of the Robbery:
     The guardians knowingly utilized Emilie’s $255,000 college trust to pay for services predicated on a diagnosis they publicly denied but privately facilitated. This act constituted the transfer of the corpus of the corrupt payments to LEHIGH, effectively liquidating Emilie’s future to fund the Enterprise’s preferred contractor.
     
     02/11/2011  The Triple Perjury:
     In a single proceeding before Judge Beltrami, three co-conspirators—Guardian Moore, Mother DeRaymond, and Lisa Spitale—simultaneously testified to the “Asperger’s” facade. Not one disclosed that the only diagnosis being billed and paid for was ICD-9 MR317 the one Judge Edward Smith had previously concealed to protect the Enterprise.
     

Phase II: The Quid Pro Quo Payment
(2011–2015)

These meetings secured the Professional Guardian Services used for Physical Coercion in Aid of Racketeering that allowed Judge Smith to pass FBI vetting, two acts attempting to permanently eliminate his victim as payment and finalized payment though kidnapping.

3. Ex Parte Hearing Three: July 13, 2011
   • The QUO. Arranged by DeRaymond just as Judge Smith began his formal application for the Federal bench.
     
     
   • Official Act: Judge Smith reappointed co-conspirator Lisa Spitale as Permanent Guardian of Emilie. This ensured the primary victim remained under enterprise control, preventing any disclosure of the fraud to the Senate Judiciary Committee or the FBI.
     Doc. 246; 247
     
     
4. Ex Parte Hearing Four: March 23, 2012
   • A petition for Special Relief by Spitale to increase Emilie’s time with the enterprise contractor LEHIGH that received the corpus of the corrupt payment from the diverted $255,000.
     
     
   • Official Act: Judge Smith granted the relief, carving out time from the Plaintiff’s vacation. The Quid Pro Quo Payments Begin: During this specific time-frame, the “coercive instrument” (cigarette burns/torture) was utilized to ensure the victim’s absolute compliance during the height of Smith’s Federal vetting process. Doc. 294
     
     2012: Extortion and maiming in Aid of Racketeering
     During the time-frame Smith carved out for Spitale / LEHIGH, Emilie suffers repeated, documented cigarette burns. Deputy Gretchen Kraemer (Smith’s associate) refuses to investigate, ensuring a “clean” FBI background check.
     
     08/28/2013: Attempted Murder in Aid of Racketeering | TABLE 1
     08/01/2013 Judge Edward Smith Nominated by President Obama.
     
     03/27/2014: Pharmacological Brain Damage
     in Aid of Racketeering |TABLE 2
     03/26/2014 Judge Edward Smith Appointed Federal Judge over Northampton County.
     
     02/06/2015: Kidnapping in Aid of Racketeering—
     Final Extortion Payment Doc. 251
     Spitale perjures herself before Judge Zito to obtain a permanent no-contact order, converting a violent kidnapping into a court-enforced prohibition. Judge Zito ignored abundance of serious injures inflicted upon his daughter since the re-appointment of Lisa Spitale cited in the plaintiff’s rebuttal to Spitale’s bogus PFA. Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255 (1992).

CLOSE
The timing of Emilie’s pharmacological overdose is the most chilling evidence of the Enterprise’s coordination. It serves as the definitive transition from the “Application Phase” to the “Immunity Phase.”

• March 26, 2014: Edward G. Smith is officially appointed as a United States District Judge. The Enterprise has successfully placed their “shield” on the Federal Bench.
  
• March 27, 2014: The Day After. With their protector now endowed with Article III power, the Enterprise immediately moved to permanently incapacitate the primary witness.

The Pharmacological “Bomb” The prescribing pattern, which had been stable for six months, was intentionally broken. Dr. Cha Yu administered an erratic, high-quantity dosage of Bupropion and Risperidone. As documented by the FDA, Bupropion suppresses the enzyme needed to metabolize Risperidone, effectively “setting a bomb off” in Emilie’s head.

The Enterprise knew that with Judge Smith on the Federal Bench, they were now “untouchable.” They moved to ensure that even if Emilie were ever rescued, she would never be able to testify against them. There was an unmistakable Meeting of the Minds. United States v. Basciano, 599 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2010).

Effect on Interstate Commerce

The Federal Courts are the primary infrastructure for resolving interstate commercial and legal disputes. By seating a judge beholden to at least four law firms that facilitated this transition, the enterprise poisoned the federal bench. Judge Smith sat in Article III jurisdiction not as an impartial jurist, but as a permanent shield for the racketeers who maimed his victim the day he took office. By placing a compromised individual into a lifetime Article III seat, the Enterprise obstructed the “honest services” of the federal government. I.e., The corruption of a federal officer (a U.S. District Judge) and the subversion of the federal confirmation process (FBI/Senate vetting) is a direct, massive assault on the instrumentalities of interstate commerce and federal governance.


[ *All guardian authority exercised over Emilie Kraemer is void ab initio, as it was predicated on a fraudulent diagnosis ICD-9 MR317 specifically ruled out by the Pennsylvania Education Appeals Panel. ]