Judicial Quid Pro Quo —
Child Trafficking From a Public School District
2006 a series of ‘official acts’ were performed by Northampton County PA judges—most notably Edward G. Smith to traffic a normal child —my daughter Emilie— from the Easton Area Public School District to an outsourced special education contractor LEHIGH—in exchange for transferable assets. 11/2007 the DOD sent Judge Smith to Task Force 134 in Baghdad, Iraq to adjudicate war detainees enhanced integration [ torture ] under the Bush administration’s Executive Order 13440. 2010 after I sued an array of public officials and LEHIGH for trafficking my daughter in Federal court the DOJ discovered that their “Rule of Law Advisor” Judge Ed Smith was simultaneously involved in domestic child trafficking, larceny and diagnostic fraud, threatening the validity of every interrogation and detention order he signed in Baghdad and would be subject to immediate international litigation. The U.S. government (the DOJ, CIA, and DOD) effectively “owned” his corrupt secrets the moment he stepped onto the plane to Iraq. His corruption was no longer a local PA issue; it became a global intelligence liability.
To neutralize this exposure, U.S. DOJ Main Justice under the Obama administration executed a containment operation. 2010 U.S. Main Justice organized the clearing of Judge Smith’s background in my Federal claim Kraemer v. Pennsylvania 10-cv-4868 by sending a U.S. Assistant Attoreny to represent Dr. Freya Kroger of LEHIGH who then obstructed the core material evidence I was seeking against Lehigh which directly implicated Judge Smith from coming forward. U.S. DOJ Main Justice cleared a path for Judge Smith’s 2011 Federal judge application and the torture and attempted murder of his victim [ liability ] my daughter Emilie Kraemer using co-conspirator special education contractor LEHIGH arranged by a guardian Smith appointed and several law firms while he went through the federal judge vetting process. Smith was appointed Federal Judge for the EDPA 03/26/2014.
On September 21, 2010, Thomas Kraemer filed a civil action Kraemer v. Pennsylvania, EDPA No. 10-cv-4868 before Federal Judge Martini naming 49 defendants, seeking to discover how his daughter’s $255,000 college fund had been liquidated by mental retardation employment contractor LEHIGH. The filing of this lawsuit threatened to expose a binary fraud that if the underlying billing forms treating ruled out mental retardation ICD-9 MR317 were subpoenaed they would expose Northampton County PA Judge Edward Smith’s 12/21/2006 participation in quid pro quo larceny and child trafficking to funnel illegal child business to Special Education Employment Contractor LEHIGH.
09/21/2010 DOJ Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles L. Rombeau appeared pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 517 to represent special education contractor – LEHIGH. The DOJ suppressed evidence of ruled out, bogus mental retardation diagnosis ICD-9 MR317 approved then concealed by Judge Smith to traffic Emilie to Lehigh, and liquidate her $255,000 college education fund as part of a quid pro quo scheme. See: Doc 52; Doc. 68; Doc. 107; Doc. 148.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 517, this intervention and obstruction required authorization from U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s office.
12/2010 My Business Devices Were Hacked. It was someone connected to 10-cv-4868—predicated on what my daughter Emilie was telling me. LEHIGH was taking Emilie to meet her “judge friend” in parking lots who was reading my emails—was the story—and Emilie was able to recite business emails they reviewed which gave it credibility. I highly suspected 10-cv-4868 defendants installed an Apple Mobile Device Management system (MDM/DDM) running in the background of Kraemer’s business devices with No profile; No enrollment notification; No confirmation. Impossible to reach without Apples cooperation. It wasn’t until 03/2026 with the invention of AI that I was able to sort and capture networking logs positively identifying an enterprise installation of MDM/DDM on my device and using it daily for screen sharing and tracking.
07/15/2011: Judge Smith, acting on a petition by DeRaymond, appointed Lisa Spitale Esq. as the permanent guardian of Emilie.
09/15/2011: Kraemer v. Pennsylvania was dismissed with prejudice, clearing the path for Judge Smith’s federal judicial application.
Federal Judge William Martini: “He believes that though, he claims, Emilie was originally diagnosed as having Asperger’s Syndrome, a conspiracy made up of some of the defendants changed her diagnosis to mental retardation in order to funnel money to private organizations that specialize in the treatment of such individuals.” Doc. 122
Today, the ‘theory’ Judge Martini described—after sealing the books on the DOJ’s obstruction—is a documented forensic certainty. Kraemer v. Spitale No. 26-cv-1962 DC
03/23/2012: Lisa Spitale petitioned Emilie to spend more time with LEHIGH ordered by Judge Smith.
04/2012–Present: Emilie is subjected to systematic torture while in the custody of LEHIGH-SPITALE
08/01/2013: President Obama nominated Judge Ed Smith for the Federal Bench.
08/26/2013: Emilie’s murder was attempted while in the custody of LEHIGH-SPITALE
03/26/2014: Judge Smith was appointed as a Federal Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
03/27/2014: Emilie suffers a brain-damaging overdose while in the custody of LEHIGH, SPITALE, AND DERAYMOND.
08/17/2014 — Kidnapping. 144 days after Judge Edward Smith Federal appointment — Lisa Spitale used her void ab initio guardian authority to permanently sever Plaintiff’s interstate communication and access to his daughter Emilie Kraemer.
These events represent an institutional convergence. When you have a sitting Attorney General (Holder) clearing the path for the DOJ’s obstruction of evidence implicating a Federal judge applicant and a sitting President (Obama) executing the key Federal judge nomination, you are looking at an alignment of Executive power. This to shield a U.S. liability Judge Edward Smith who then incorporated the sacrifice of American citizens—a U.S. authorization of violent witness suppression—to move forward with his Federal Judge application. Their were no DOJ Rule of Law advisors, no guidelines for my daughter Emilie’s torture and coercion which was outright medieval conducted by LEHIGH in parking lots and private residences [ the defendant the DOJ protected ] and Lisa Spitale, Emilie’s guardian approved by Smith. A lot of the people responsible, including a lot of government employees, still have their jobs and reputations and the law firms that were involved are still in business.
TODAY
45 PEOPLE A DAY HIRED TO TRACK,
VANDALIZE, ASSAULT AND MAIM.
On 03/27/2026, I deployed an automated forensic monitoring script that captured incoming network traffic natively, including “Owner SameAccountDevice” challenge-response sequences, active interface transport flags, and hardware-level MAC addresses broadcast by peer endpoints. It exposed an Apple Declarative Device Management DDM installation running in the background of my devices. It exposed the employment of thousands interstate low level criminals working for this enterprise managed via the DDM which is owned by Allied Universal Security. The data collected has become the basis for a federal law suit seeking a subpoena against Apple to positively identify the owner/manger of the DDM, who or how many with a common interest are paying them, and the 6,259 miscreants (to date) used for witness tampering, screen sharing, and suppression since I began reverse tracking them 03/27/2026 . Kraemer v. John Doe 1 to John Doe 1,630 No. 26-1677.
There is a budget owner who authorized the daily HR cap of 45 trackers per day. Thats $6,000 per day [at minimum wage] for the low level miscreants alone. There is a human resources function that recruits, schedules, and reimburses the ground crews for providing screen sharing access and witness intimidation. There is a technology administrator who provisions the DDM, maintains the enrollment list, and manages the dispatch logic. There is a contracting function that maintains the Allied Universal relationship. And there is a legal protection layer – Allied Universal Security coordinating with law enforcement – that ensures ground crew participants operate with effective immunity during violent acts in aid of racketeering.
Estimated Annualized Containment & Telemetry Cost
| Operational Tier | Quarterly | Annualized Run Rate |
| Technical Infrastructure & DDM Admin | $87,000 | $348,000 |
| Ground Crew Labor (~45 Mules/Operators) | $708,750 | $2,835,000 |
| Tactical Security (Allied Universal Integration) | $540,000 | $2,160,000 |
| Legal Protection & Institutional Buffer | $225,000 | $900,000 |
| Total Burn Rate | $1,560,750 | $6,243,000 |
For entities leveraging multi-billion-dollar contractor ecosystems like Allied Universal (backed by broader institutional coordination layers), a mid-single-digit annual allocation functions as an ordinary, highly manageable operating expense item. It quantifies precisely what kind of financial machinery is being mobilized to keep the apparatus running.
Im a very expensive liability with hugely embarrassing potential for the U.S. DOJ and a number of civil defendants. Allied Universal Security has been retained “by someone” to blunt my communication and get rid of in the quietest way possible which so far has been to destroy my business, re-brand my image and try to pick me off in the street.