2015 Pitta CMO “You Don’t Decide We Decide”

Vincent Pitta. Pitta Bishop & Del Giorno LLC, My former client represents the Hotel Trades Council the most powerful union in NYC. 

2013 his team spoke to me about the Norwegian Scabies deliberately cultivated on my daughter 08/2013 that nearly killed her. Partner Jon Del Giorno who saw the pictures of it said the mother Amy DeRaymond “should have been arrested” The firm abruptly changed direction [double dealing] and stoped talking to me about it. Apparently they figured out Amy DeRaymond’s connection to then Republican Federal Judge applicant Edward Smith then began doing favors that benefited him. The Norwegian Scabies Del Giorno saw were deliberately cultivated to attempt my daughter’s murder they attempted to finalize right after Judge Smith received his nomination from President Obama.

2015 when I sued in the SDNY 15-cv-1755 Kraemer v. Fontno asking about fraudulent diagnosis billing code ICD-9 MR317 approved by Judge Smith used to SELL my daughter to employment contractor for the mentally retarded Lehigh University Transition Services Pitta Bishop & Del Giorno LLC CFO threatened me:

“YOU DON’T DECIDE WE DECIDE”

04/01/2015 SDNY 15-cv-1755 was Dismissed. The order was nonsensical. It completely circumvented the merits and central arguments of the compliant so much so I filed a Motion to Reconsider.

04/14/2015 The MTR pointed out and recapitulated obvious federal violations and that the Judge [Pro Se attorneys] had no ground to dismiss my case. It made obvious the absurdity of the dismissal. I made page reference to each time I mentioned Emilie’s federally protected pendent placement diagnosis PDD-NOS in the original complaint —the central cause of action— and that it was never mentioned in the dismissal. I also created a table that showed every place false claim ICD-9 MR317 was presented for processing Medicaid payments buttressed against the the PA State Appeals Panel Order approving diagnosis code PDD-NOS that specifically ruled out diagnosis code ICD-9 MR317.

04/23/2015 an Order was issued denying the motion for reconsideration.