Detail
On September 21, 2010, Thomas Kraemer filed a civil action (Kraemer v. Pennsylvania, E.D. Pa. No. 10-cv-4868) naming 49 defendants, seeking to discover how his daughter’s college fund had been liquidated by a mental retardation employment contractor. The filing of this lawsuit threatened to expose a binary fraud that if the underlying billing forms treating ruled out mental retardation ICD-9 MR317 were subpoenaed they would expose Northampton County PA Judge Edward Smith’s 12/21/2006 participation in quid pro quo larceny and child trafficking to funnel illegal child business to Special Education Employment Contractor LEHIGH.
This exposure created an immediate national security crisis for the Department of Justice. On 11/2007 the DOJ had enlisted Judge Smith to serve as a Rule of Law Advisor Judge for Task Force 134 at Camp Victory in Baghdad, Iraq, where he adjudicated the detention and enhanced interrogation [torture] conditions of war detainees until 06/2008 pursuant to the Bush Administration’s 07/20/2007 Executive Order 13440 that put the CIA in control of interrogations. 01/22/2009 President Obama revoked Executive Order 13440 authorizations of torture.
If Judge Smith were unmasked in open federal court as a domestic child trafficker and larcenist who manipulated medical codes for financial gain, his wartime adjudications would be instantly compromised under international law, human rights treaties, and federal habeas corpus petitions, threatening a catastrophic unraveling of the theater internment infrastructure.
To neutralize this exposure, U.S. Main Justice executed a containment operation. The DOJ under the Obama Administration bypassed regional boundaries and dispatched New Hampshire Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles L. Rombeau to represent LEHIGH’s director Freya Kroger( See 11/29/2010 Doc 52; 12/30/2010 Doc. 68; 05/09/2011 Doc. 107; 10/21/2011 Doc. 148). Acting with explicit intent to conceal, Assistant U.S. Attorney Rombeau suppressed LEHIGH’s billing data and historical use of the mental retardation ICD-9 MR317 billing code, offending 18 U.S.C. 1962(d); § 1512(c)(2); § 1519; § 1341; §1343.
To send a U.S. Attorney pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 517 the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder had to authorize it in interests of the United States. If the case touches on broader political, diplomatic, or constitutional issues—which this absolutely does— Main Justice will coordinate with outside federal agencies like the Department of State. Out of the 49 defendants the DOJ sent an attorney to represent LEHIGH the vendor Judge Smith entangled in undisclosed larceny and child trafficking then withheld the core material medical evidence [ ruled out diagnosis code ICD-9 MR317 ] that would have proved child trafficking.
Delaware Assistant U.S. Attorney Patricia C. Hannigan was sent to represent federal Judges Pratter and Rice as was established authority: 28 C.F.R. § 50.15, grounded in 28 U.S.C. §§ 516–517 and § 509, authorizes DOJ to represent federal employees and officials sued in their individual capacity.
By withholding these self-authenticating billing records, the DOJ induced U.S. District Judge William Martini to dismiss the action on September 15, 2011, explicitly characterizing Plaintiff’s documented asset diversion as a mere speculative “theory” or “belief” dismissing his case with prejudice.
Federal Judge William Martini “He believes that though, he claims, Emilie was originally diagnosed as having Asperger’s Syndrome, a conspiracy made up of some of the defendants changed her diagnosis to mental retardation in order to funnel money to private organizations that specialize in the treatment of such individuals.” Doc. 122.
Today, the ‘theory’ Judge Martini described—after sealing the books on the DOJ’s obstruction—is a documented forensic certainty. Kraemer v. Spitale, D.C. No. 26-cv-1962
The DOJ ensured the books were sealed permanently insulating the paper trail from public scrutiny. This tactical obstruction achieved its primary institutional objective: it scrubbed Judge Smith’s background check, clearing his path through the FBI vetting process and guaranteeing the viability of his formal application for the federal bench. 2012 Judge Smith and his coconspirators, including LEHIGH tortured his victim my daughter to ensure his unfettered path to the federal bench with no interference from the U.S. Attorney General.
08/01/2013 The President Obama nominated Judge Smith for Federal Judge. The DOJ/CIA effectively placed what they knew to be a violent child trafficker on the Federal bench to cover their [ ass ] lack of due diligence from 2007. 08/26/2013 I stoped my daughter’s attempted murder from a deliberately cultivated lethal disease. 03/26/2014 Judge Smith was appointed Federal Judge – the next day 03/27/2014 my daughter Emilie was overdosed with pharmaceuticals brain damaging her.
They also electronically containerized me. An unauthorized Apple Declarative Device Management system (DDM) was covertly installed on my laptop 12/2010 -three months after I opened 10-cv-4868. I was unable to prove it until 2026 when I used AI to comb through active networking logs to expose the installation and captured it operating in real time. This DDM was used to enroll thousands of devices into my Apple account, belonging to individuals creating a mobile surveillance infrastructure and the coordination of ground crews for violent witness suppression. It’s not a gang, it’s law enforcement and they have a substantial operating budget.
Ground Crew Log: https://kraemerinc.com/gallery/index_gallery.html
Law Enforcement Participation: https://kraemerinc.com/govparse/
Organizational Architecture: https://kraemerinc.com/ddm/
Surveillance Dashboard: https://kraemerinc.com/fmparse/dashboard.php
The Federal Courts reaction upon filing these facts has been to delay while local law enforcement ramps up assaults, accidents and threats of future violence during the pendency of proceedings. Federal and State Judges both have routinely ignored documented reports of retaliation, including a hit and run, two attempted murders ( assaults with deadly weapons) specifically as a warning for my requesting discovery. This to the extent there is an appearance the courts are coordinating with lawenforment in fraud upon the Court. Current filings:
Kraemer v. Spitale, D.C. No. 26-cv-1962
Kraemer v. John Does 1 to 1,630 SDNY No. 26-cv-4436
Phase I: The $255,000 Robbery (2006–2010)
On December 21, 2006, Attorney Raymond DeRaymond operating on behalf of the Easton PA School District obtained a corrupt official act from his former law partner Judge Edward Smith—the appointment of a Guardian to treat Plaintiff’s daughter Emilie for mental retardation diagnosis ICD-9 MR317, specifically ruled out by binding State Education Appeals Panel Order No. 1727—in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(2); 20 U.S.C. § 1415(j); 18 U.S.C. § 1346; Susquenita School District v. Raelee S., 96 F.3d 78 (3d Cir. 1996); and McDonnell v. United States, 579 U.S. 550 (2016). Judge Ed Smith concealed the use of ICD-9 MR317 to approve the order from the Court record.
The order was issued the same day Federal Judge Pratter convened a conference to enforce the child’s actual PDD-NOS diagnosis, and $255,000 award to make up for the education denied her for falsely claiming she was mentally retarded. The false and concealed ICD-9 MR317 claim was used to send business to a local special education contractor (Lehigh) creating a pre-planned jurisdictional bypass to liquidate the child’s $255,000 trust.
Judge Smith’s former client Mother DeRaymond was brutally abusing Emilie before cognitive assessment placement exams to drop IQ scores, this with the help of the District and the Court of Common pleas that overlooked organized abuse used to steer business to special education contractors and for the windfall of government money that manufacturing mental disabilities brought into the county. The Easton Area School District used students on social services for organized bullying during school hours to encapsulate targeted students in 24/7 chaos. They were a violent, child trafficking enterprise.
11/2007–06/2008 Task Force 134 Bagdad Iraq. Northampton County Judge Ed Smith was enlisted by the DOD/CIA as a Rule of Law Advisor for the U.S. central detention center Task Force 134 in Bagdad Iraq adjudicating enhanced interrogations [ torture ] of war detainees administered by the CIA pursuant to DOJ guidelines. After serving his country and upon his return to the Northampton County Court of Common Pleas Judge Smith continued the use of his public office for corrupt acts with the additional first hand knowledge of the effects of torture, and coercion on a subject.
2008 – 2010 the financial recipients of Judge Smith’s 2006 official corrupt act – the State and Federal guardians who became employed as a result of it – concealed DeRaymond’s treatment of Emilie for ruled out ICD-9 MR317 for the purpose of gaining entrance to the criminal RICO enterprise.
08/27/2010 the robbery was completed by federal guardian Shanon Moore who diverted the $255,000 from the child victim’s college fund to mental retardation employment contractor LEHIGH and then enrolled her with the contractor completing the robbery in aid of racketeering, and trafficking proscribed by 18 U.S.C § 1584. See Kraemer v. Spitale 26-cv-1962 DC.
In every courtroom proceeding spanning 9 years, the mother, every State and Federal guardian and District representative told one story: Emilie Kraemer’s diagnosis was PDD-NOS or Asperger’s. On every MH/MR service billing form approved by the guardians and the mother spanning those same 9 years told a different story: Emilie Kraemer’s diagnosis was ICD-9 MR317—mental retardation the diagnosis that had been specifically ruled out and that the $255,000 education award was specifically intended to remedy.
The billing records and the court records cannot both be true. Both exist. Both are self-authenticating documents. That documentary contradiction is the evidentiary core of Judge Smith’s and DeRaymond’s Quid Pro Quo robbery.
This phase concluded in 2010 when the corpus of the $255,000 trust was fully liquidated and Emilie’s college matriculation was blocked to fund the Enterprise’s mental retardation employment contractor LEHIGH.
2010 DOJ Official Act: Obstruction
09/21/2010 Kraemer v. Pennsylvania 10-cv-4868 and the U.S. Department of Justice. The victim’s father opened Pennsylvania 10-cv-4868 on behalf of his daughter. U.S. assistant attorney Charles L. Rombeau made an appearance for Lehigh’s Director Freya Kroger, the recipient of the corpus of the corrupt $255,000 payment initiated by Judge Ed Smith’s corrupt official act facilitated by DeRaymond, two Federal guardians, one State guardian and three other Northampton County Judges. The DOJ suppressed Lehigh’s use of ruled out ICD-9 MR317—approved then concealed by Judge Smith—as part of a second quid pro quo scheme.
The official criminal act of obstruction by the DOJ signaled to every coconspirator defendant in 10-cv-4868 (All three guardians and PA AG Linda Kelly) to also suppress their use of ICD-9 MR317 used for the $255,000 robbery and trafficking of Emilie Kraemer turning them into a federally protected RICO enterprise.
09/15/2011 Dismissal With Prejudice 10-cv-4868. Federal Judge William Martini “He believes that though, he claims, Emilie was originally diagnosed as having Asperger’s Syndrome, a conspiracy made up of some of the defendants changed her diagnosis to mental retardation in order to funnel money to private organizations that specialize in the treatment of such individuals.” Doc. 122.
Today, the ‘theory’ Judge Martini described—after sealing the books on the DOJ’s obstruction—is a documented forensic certainty.
Phase II: The Extortion and Repayment (2011–2015)
The DOJ’s Official Act of concealing Judge Smith’s criminality allowed him to pursue his 2011 Federal Judge application and effectively approved the continued quid pro quo use of his public office to obtain his Federal Judge appointment. Judge Smith was free to use the power of his public office to leverage the Phase I debt to induce the re-appointment of defendant Lisa Spitale as Limited Permanent Guardian with sole discretion over Emilie’s general care, maintenance, and custody pursuant to 20 Pa. C.S. § 5512.1(b).
Four private ex parte hearings were arranged by DeRaymond before his former law partner Judge Smith, each producing a formal judicial act within the meaning of McDonnell v. United States, 579 U.S. 550 (2016), two timed to Smith’s Federal judge application.
Meeting 1. 05/12/2006 DeRaymond applied for total custody of Emilie immediately after Plaintiff won $200,000 in Administrative Proceeding No. 5779 05/06.
Meeting 2. 12/21/2006 Official Act—the QUID: DeRaymond obtained Smith’s corrupt guardian appointment Order the same afternoon Federal Judge Pratter convened a settlement conference to enforce Plaintiff’s $255,000 education award.
09/21/2011 DOJ Obstruction 10-cv-4868
Meeting 3. 07/15/2011 Official Act—Quid Pro Quo: DeRaymond arranged coconspirator Spitale’s reappointment before Smith as Smith formally applied for Federal judge.
Meeting 4. 03/23/2012 Spitale petitioned Smith for Special Relief increasing Emilie’s time with LEHIGH —who received the corpus of the corrupt payment from plaintiff’s $255,000 trust he obtained for his daughter—initiating the violent payment sequence.
The payments not due to Judge Smith were violent acts in aid of racketeering proscribed by 18 U.S.C. § 1959 delivered through guardian Lisa Spitale’s (no show) guardian authority, and LEHIGH [ the recipient of the corpus of the $255,000 corrupt payment protected by the DOJ ] timed to Judge Smith’s Federal nomination milestones with documentary precision.
Under the No-Show Job precedent established in the United States v. Skelos, 707 F. App’x 30 (2d Cir. 2017) and United States v. Silver, 864 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 2017), “intangible property of quantifiable market value” Spitale’s no show appointment was the mechanical instrument of extortion—compensation not for legitimate guardianship but for a violent witness suppression and silence detail to clear Judge Smith’s path through the FBI vetting process created by the DOJ resulting in the transferable asset: the liquid income and power of Judge Smith’s new job as Federal judge procured through the extortion of the Plaintiff’s right to a fair and honest judicial process.
Payment One: Torture. 08/06/2012: Lisa Spitale arranged the torture of Judge Smith’s victim and police protection to conceal it from FBI—the plaintiffs sister, Judge Ed Smith’s close friend Deputy Gretchen Kraemer’s—refused to document, report or arrest Emilie’s torture assailants leaving no police record for FBI.
Payment Two: Attempted Murder. 08/26/2013 Attempted Murder. Norwegian Scabies deliberately cultivated through sequential immunosuppressant prescriptions under a false Eczema diagnosis—placed into strategic remission six days before Smith’s 08/01/2013 Presidential nomination and re-cultivated six days after, nearly killing the victim until the Plaintiff intervened from New York;
Payment Three: Maiming. 03/27/2014 Pharmacological maiming via Risperidone doubled on the day after Smith’s Federal Judge appointment—successfully incapacitating the witness/victim after the failed 2013 attempted murder, finalizing the Enterprise’s security at the moment Smith acquired Article III immunity as Federal Judge for Northampton County PA;
Payment Four: Kidnapping. 08/17/2014 kidnapping of my daughter Emilie Kraemer—the final extortion payment— delivered 144 days after Smith took the Federal bench to permanently insulate the Enterprise from disclosure. Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255, 268 (1992).
A sitting Article III judge receiving professional services as the final payment in an extortion scheme he initiated as a state court judge satisfies the interstate commerce requirement of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962; §1951 at the highest possible level.
Lisa Spitale’s No-Show Job as Transferable Property
In the Second Circuit, property under the Hobbs Act includes intangible rights and future economic interests. Lisa Spitale, by not showing up for her duties as guardian after directing Smith’s victim, Emilie to Lehigh—the recipient of the corpus of the corrupt payment from Emilie’s $255,000 trust—was pummeled by them, Spitale and the Enterprise provided Smith with the ultimate thing of value: a clear path to a lifetime Federal Appointment (Article III).
The Exchange: Smith provided the Official Act (the 2006 robbery) which liquidated the plaintiff’s $255,000 for the Enterprise.
The Repayment: In 2011, Spitale accepted the no-show guardian appointment—where her actual “work” was not guardianship, but the violence-for-hire (cigarette burns, Norwegian scabies, pharmacological maiming) required to ensure Smith’s clean Federal vetting after the DOJ obstructed evidence of Judge Smith 12/21/2006 use of his public office for robbery and trafficking.
The Transferable Asset: The value obtained by Smith was the liquid income and power of his new Federal Judgeship, which was only attainable because the Enterprise effectively bought the victim’s silence using the stolen $255,000. United States v. Skelos 707 F. App’x 30 (2d Cir. 2017); United States v. Silver 864 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 2017).
Effect On Interstate Commerce
Poisoning of the Federal Infrastructure: The Federal Courts are the primary infrastructure for resolving interstate commercial and personal legal disputes. By seating a judge beholden to at least FOUR law firms that facilitated this transition, the Enterprise poisoned the federal bench.
— Attorney Ray DeRaymond Esq., 2007 Joined Gross, McGinley LLP. Died 2019;
— State guardian Lisa Spitale Esq. 2005 – 2015 The Law Offices Of Charles W. Gordon;
— Federal guardian Shanon Moore Esq., 2010-2014: Gallagher, Schoenfeld, Surkin, Chupein & DeMis;
— Federal guardian Marcie Romberger Esq., 2007 – 2010 Quit for having a conflict of interest when her husband joined school District’s law firm Sweet, Stevens, Katz & Williams LLP in 2010—the then Romberger herself joined Sweet, Stevens on 07/29/2020.
Judge Smith sat in Article III jurisdiction not as an impartial jurist, but as a permanent shield for the racketeers who maimed his victim the day he took office. By placing a compromised individual into a lifetime Article III seat, the Enterprise obstructed the honest services of the federal government.
DOJ High-Stakes Damage Control.
2014 to 11/2023 Judge Smith sat in Article III jurisdiction, because his benefactor—the DOJ in 2010 concealed his quid pro quo robbery facilitation. It raises concerning questions regarding Domestic terrorism proscribed by 18 U.S.C. § 2331(5) (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion. When the DOJ Main Justice stepped in to obstruct justice 09/21/2010 Kraemer v. Pennsylvania 10-cv-4868 they officially removed Judge Smith criminal obstacles to applying for federal Judge.
Judge Smith had to know the circumstances upon which his successful federal application hinged and clearly knew the 2013 torture, 2013 attempted murder 2014 maiming and 2015 kidnapping of his victim, my daughter in aid of racketeering would never get looked into.
The DOJ [ and CIA ] effectively put their “Manchurian candidate” on the federal bench. Why? Because they did not do their due diligence in 2007 before they sent the criminally inclined justice to Bagdad Iraq Task Force 134. Then in 2010 due to my suing 48 defendants in 10-cv-4868 were forced into a highly illegal PR reputation managment campaign:
The Global Fallout Risk: If the 2010 litigation had exposed that a Northampton County judge was actively engaging in domestic quid pro quo schemes, diagnostic manipulation, and financial robbery using his public office, his judicial integrity would have been completely compromised. Because Judge Smith served as a primary Rule of Law advisor adjudicating detentions and enhanced interrogations at Camp Victory Bagdad Iraq, any proof of domestic corruption would have immediately weaponized challenges against his wartime adjudications under international law, human rights treaties, or habeas petitions.
The Mechanism of the New Lie: To insulate the entire Task Force 134 apparatus from a catastrophic loss of credibility, U.S. Main Justice stepped into Kraemer v. Pennsylvania to suppress the evidence. The appearance of the Assistant U.S. Attorney to shield the private contractor and bury the diagnostic fraud was the mechanical implementation of that containment.
The Compounding Conspiracy: The DOJ didn’t just overlook a local ethical breach; they actively chose to maintain an unblemished facade for a strategic national security actor. They knew that if the 2010 domestic fraud came to light, it would blow a hole through the legal legitimacy of the theater internment operations in Iraq. Therefore, clearing his path to the federal bench in 2014 was the ultimate method of permanent containment—shrouding him in Article III immunity to keep both the old lie and the new lie permanently under wraps. They treated 10-cv-4868 as a catastrophic public relations exposure point that threatened the integrity of their wartime legal framework.
To that end, there was—and still is—an extreme focus on the containment of their corrupt official act. A part of that was building an electronic container around me.
The Budget Dedicated To Blunt My Communication—Who Is Paying?
12/2010 I knew someone connected to 10-cv-4868—predicated on what my daughter Emilie was telling—me had access to my work devices. LEHIGH was taking Emilie to meet her “judge friend” in parking lots who was reading my emails—was the story—and Emilie was able to recite business emails they reviewed which gave it credibility. I highly suspected 10-cv-4868 defendants installed an Apple Mobile Device Management system (MDM/DDM) running in the background of Kraemer’s business devices with No profile; No enrollment notification; No confirmation. I clearly thought it was an MDM and not a two stage reverse shell. It wasn’t until 03/2026 with the invention of AI that I was able to sort and capture networking logs positively identifying an enterprise installation of MDM/DDM on my device and using it daily for screen sharing and tracking.
It imploded my business Kraemer Inc., and sullied my reputation from 2010 to 2015. Kraemer Design Inc., a strategic brand consultancy with over two decades serving Fortune 500 clients including IBM, Swatch, PwC, Marsh, Korn Ferry International, various and sundry law firms.
45 people a day hired to track, vandalize, and assault.
On 03/27/2026, I deployed an automated forensic monitoring script that captured incoming network traffic natively, including “Owner SameAccountDevice” challenge-response sequences, active interface transport flags, and hardware-level MAC addresses broadcast by peer endpoints. It exposed a Apple Declarative Device Management DDM re-installation running in the background of my devices after I changed the password on my Keychain. https://www.kraemerinc.com/forensicmonitor/.
03/27/2026 to 05/02/2026 the script caught the DDM administrators distributing owner-tier credentials to over 1,630 pre-enrolled devices not belonging to Plaintiff, each cryptographically “Owner SameAccountDevice” verified as if they were plaintiff’s own devices. Each unauthorized enrollment was issued by IDS token BBzlfMIo, (a DDM account manager) authenticating devices as owners of Plaintiff’s Apple account.
Who are they?
1. Day-to-day screen-sharing mules—ground crews. They are comprised of the most deniable, disposable, invisible people in society: low income individuals, the elderly, migrants and mistreated social services clients. Mules—used day-to-day to get within 33 feet of BLE bluetooth / screen sharing range of me needed for the DDM operators initial screen sharing request to jump from Apple Wireless Direct Link – TT 0x4 AWD via an iPhone or iPad enrolled with the DDM to a TT 0x10 DirectLink providing the steady streaming of my screen. I never ask for screen sharing so they get one of the thousands of devices enrolled in the DDM they enrolled my device in to do it. That’s the operational genius of it and the criminal moral depravity of it.
2. Assault-maiming and government interference crews. A second ground crew comprised of union members, law clerks, emergency medical staff and law-enforcement are used blunt service at retail settings, courts, urgent care facilities, they provide immunity for violent ground crews [ migrants/contractors ]. They influence improper medical treatment at urgent care facilities resulting from injuries inflicted by the DDM organized ground crews. This is how you get “flushed,” disappeared or killed.
3. Breakdown in The Rule of Law. Not addressing the merits of my cases while allowing organized violence during the pendency of my cases has been a pattern with the NY State and Federal Courts anytime I attempted to get to the bottom of this. The Court’s allowance of reported violence without a meeting during the pendency of my cases invalidates any claim preclusion but so far has not been the case. i.e., the Courts have willfully participated in keeping me on this violent, U.S. /DOJ/Law-enforcement induced merry-go-round.
DDM Operators-Owners: Allied Universal Security
Interstate State Lawenforment entities NYPD; NYPD DOI; NYPD IAB; OIC Security; NY Court clerks including Federal clerks Northampton County PA Police; NJ County Police have demonstrated direct access to the illegal MDM account. Federal Lawenforment entities: DOJ personnel; U.S. Capitol Police; CGI IT; Armed Security at Federal Courts all managed by Allied Universal Security have all demonstrated direct access to the MDM account installed on my laptop.
09/08/2023 Allied Universal was caught operating the illegal DDM installed on my laptop. An Allied Universal Security employee admitted to cough, cough, coughing in corollary to my computer screen activity “as just doing his job.” “His boss made him do it.” Thus establishing Allied Universal as the key owner operator of the MDM/DDM. Allied Universal has HUGE government security contracts.
The MDM for which law enforcement has access to—managed by Allied Universal Security—is used to dispatch violent ground crews which are protected and receive immunity from law enforcement and private security.
Operational Structure / Strategy
The script reveled 1,140 Owner SameAccountDevice, devices operating at ranges at up to 300 meters via Apple Wireless Direct Link – TT 0x4 AWDL – from me that received the initial screen sharing requests from the DDM that consistently preceded TT 0x10 DirectLink convergences operating within Bluetooth BLE range ( 33 feet ) from the plaintiff providing full screen sharing streaming capacity from my laptop (Exhibit G).
There were 1,921 Owner SameAccountDevice, TT 0x10 DirectLink authentications placing unauthorized devices within 33 feet of Plaintiff’s physical location after the initial 300 meter authentications occurred (Exhibit F).
33 Feet is Apple’s laptop Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) broadcast range at which a 0x10 DirectLink connection can occur. It is also the prerequisite connection for Owner SameAccountDevice Screen Sharing to become fully viable. (screen sharing can be used via TT 0x4 AWDL however TT 0x10 DirectLink provides a wider range of services )
The DDM operator—prior to 0x10 DirectLink convergences—pre-staged Screen Sharing services via TT 0x4 AWDL connected ground crews providing limited screen sharing capacity that then gets passed to ground crews operating within BLE range [33 feet of the plaintiff] for full streaming capacity. The DDM operator cannot easily/reliably view my screen directly without the assistance of ground crews sitting within BLE range Exhibit L.
The ground crew mules had one job: show up within 33 feet of BLE DirectLink range and sit down, so my screen sharing would become fully streamable to the DDM’s operators along with other services such as keyboard sharing. The DDM sets the table. Miscreants (mules) requiring no expertise sit down for dinner while their devices provided the bluetooth connection for the DDM operator to see my laptop’s screen, camera, or provide keyboard access uninterrupted.
The violent ground crews inflict injuries, specifically the transference of staph infection, and subsequent intimidation to treatment at Urgent Care medical centers guarded by Allied Universal. Fall asleep in your car Allied provides cover for teams to shove a medical grade articulated endoscope through door cracks and into your mouth, to inject infection, and break crowns. The ground crews also put on staged skits via – provocations, structured by Allied Security allowing them to reach out to local lawenforment over “concerns” which they engineer. e.g., no calls to the police for my maiming, those calls occur when you interfere with their ground crew’s 18 U.S.C. § 1959 offenses. Very sophisticated, very practiced. State rest stops are Allied’s prime targets for maiming and vandalism in aid of racketeering. Basically they re-package your personal brand so you can be ignored and erased. Cough, cough, cough!!
Substantial Budget—Someone is Paying Allied Universal. The human resources function is substantial. It recruits, schedules, and reimburses ground crews; There is a technology administrator who provisions the DDM, maintains the enrollment list, and manages the dispatch logic. There is a contracting function that maintains the security firm relationships. And there is a legal protection layer – law enforcement coordination – that ensures ground crew participants operate with effective immunity during violent acts in aid of racketeering. The “slush fund” paying for this, the end game to effectively erase me from existence – points directly the the DOJ’s initial obstruction and the U.S. retention of their primary security contractor Allied Universal Security.
Sources
- Executive Order 13440 — 07/20/2007 Interpretation of the Geneva Conventions Common Article 3 as Applied to a Program of Detention and Interrogation Operated by the Central Intelligence Agency. Assigns CIA-program implementing authority to the CIA Director (Section 3(c))(Section 4). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/WCPD-2007-07-30/pdf/WCPD-2007-07-30-Pg1000.pdf
- Task Force 134 — Detainee Operations Standard Operating Procedure. Defining TF134’s mission.
Theater Internment Facility processing, Geneva Convention IV compliance. Page 105 Interrogation. Interrogation Operations. Task Force 134 controlled U.S. detainee operations in Iraq.
https://wikileaks.org/static/pdf/US-DoD-Taskforce-134-Detainee-SOP-2008-02-25.pdf; https://www.stripes.com/news/2008-12-12/us-iraq-set-up-detainee-transfers-1941450.html; - 11/2007–06/2008 Northampton County (Naval Reservist) Judge Edward Smith’s assignment to Camp Victory Bagdad Iraq | Task Force 134 as Rule of Law Advisor. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Edward-Smith-Senate-Judiciary-Questionnaire-Final.pdf; https://www.lehighvalleylive.com/northampton-county/2014/03/senate_approves_northampton_co.html
- Waterboarding: V. Practical Advice For Judge Advocates ¶86 The Air Force Law Review • Volume 69 2013
This was published after the Obama Administration revoked the Bush Administration Executive Order 13440. However, gives clear insight the types of top secret information extracted during enhanced integration Judge Smith was required to rule on, on a daily basis as part of Task Force 134’s primary mission as a detention and integration center. Thats is, Judge Edward Smith got a live in-depth lesson on the effectiveness of coercion, and behavioral sciences administered by the CIA.
https://www.afjag.af.mil/Portals/77/documents/Law%20Review/AFD-130509-003.pdf; U.S. Interrogation Policy and Executive Order 13440 (September 25, 2007 - Task Force 134(40) — 06/08/2008 Camp Victory Bagdad Iraq. Maj. Gen. Douglas M. Stone turned over his command of Task Force 134 Detainee Operations to Rear Adm. Garland P. Wright in a ceremony conducted at the Al Faw Palace. https://www.dvidshub.net/news/20533/detainee-operations-changes-command-leadership
- Judge Ed Smith’s quote on witnessing torture — WFMZ obituary/tribute article quoting Smith’s 2008 statement:
“I have a whole different perception of the term human rights, after seeing people who were tortured.”
2012 – 2014 Judge Ed Smith went on to authorize the torture of his child trafficking victim Emilie Kraemer to insure the smooth transition for his federal judge application made possible by the DOJ concealing the criminal use of his public office. Kraemer v. Spitale No. 26-cv-1962 United States District Court – District of Columbia. https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/lehighvalley/federal-judge-navy-veteran-edward-smith-remembered-for-service-to-his-country-northampton-county/article_c0c7106c-8e36-11ee-9dd1-bb06e7b1d38a.html - DOJ Obstruction of Justice 09/21/2010— Kraemer v. Pennsylvania, No. 2:10-cv-04868-WJM. Docket Entries 41 and 52, documenting US Assistant Attorney Charles L. Rombeau (D.N.H.) appearance for Dr. Freya Koger Director LEHIGH Transition Services, employment contractor for the mentally retarded—the recipient of $255,000 in diverted funds resulting from Judge Smith’s use of his public office for a criminal arrangement. (PACER Docket Report).
US Assistant Attorney Patricia C. Hannigan (D. Del.) appearance for EDPA Federal Magistrate Judge Tim Rice. Judge Rice’s guardian appointees concealed ruled out mental retardation diagnosis ICD-9 MR317 for the purpose of gaining entrance to the RICO enterprise initiated by Smith, including the facilitation of Judge Smith’s victims torture. (PACER Docket Report). - Domestic terrorism — 18 U.S.C. § 2331(5) (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion. 09/21/2010 / 10-cv-4868 the U.S. Department of Justice assistant attorney Charles L. Rombeau used his influence over LEHIGH Transition Services to conceal Kroger’s use of mental retardation ICD-9 MR317 approved then concealed by judge Smith in violation of Federal law (candor) . DOJ Rombeau opened Judge Smith’s path for his Federal Judge application. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2331;
- 01/06/2014 Judge Edward Smith— The Honorable Patrick J. Leahy Chairman Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Edward-Smith-Senate-Judiciary-Questionnaire-Final.pdf