Phase I: The $255,000 Robbery (2006–2010)
On December 21, 2006, Attorney Raymond DeRaymond operating on behalf of the Easton PA School District obtained a corrupt official act from his former law partner Judge Edward Smith—the appointment of a Guardian to treat Plaintiff’s daughter Emilie for mental retardation diagnosis ICD-9 MR317, specifically ruled out by binding State Education Appeals Panel Order No. 1727—in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(2); 20 U.S.C. § 1415(j); 18 U.S.C. § 1346; Susquenita School District v. Raelee S., 96 F.3d 78 (3d Cir. 1996); and McDonnell v. United States, 579 U.S. 550 (2016). Judge Ed Smith concealed the use of ICD-9 MR317 to approve the order from the Court record.
The order was issued the same day Federal Judge Pratter convened a conference to enforce the child’s actual PDD-NOS diagnosis, and $255,000 award to make up for the education denied her for falsely claiming she was mentally retarded. The false and concealed ICD-9 MR317 claim was used to send business to a local special education contractor (Lehigh) creating a pre-planned jurisdictional bypass to liquidate the child’s $255,000 trust.
Judge Smith’s former client Mother DeRaymond was brutally abusing Emilie before cognitive assessment placement exams to drop IQ scores, this with the help of the District and the Court of Common pleas that overlooked organized abuse used to steer business to special education contractors and for the windfall of government money that manufacturing mental disabilities brought into the county. The Easton Area School District used students on social services for organized bullying during school hours to encapsulate targeted students in 24/7 chaos. They were a violent, child trafficking enterprise.
2007 – 2008 Northampton County Judge Ed Smith was enlisted by the DOD/CIA as a Judge at Task Force 134 in Bagdad Iraq adjudicating enhanced interrogations [ torture ] of war detainees as per DOJ guidelines. Upon his return to Northampton County Judge Smith continued the use of his public office for corrupt acts.
2006 – 2010 the financial recipients of Judge Smith’s 2006 official corrupt act – the State and Federal guardians who became employed as a result of it – concealed DeRaymond’s treatment of Emilie for ruled out ICD-9 MR317 for the purpose of gaining entrance to the criminal enterprise to divert the $255,000 from the child victim’s college fund to mental retardation employment contractor Lehigh and then enrolled her with the contractor completing the robbery in aid of racketeering 08/27/2010. Human trafficking proscribed by 18 U.S.C § 1584 as part of a quid pro quo scheme.
In every courtroom proceeding spanning 9 years, the mother, every State and Federal guardian and District representative told one story: Emilie Kraemer’s diagnosis was PDD-NOS or Asperger’s. On every MH/MR service billing form approved by the guardians and the mother spanning those same 9 years told a different story: Emilie Kraemer’s diagnosis was ICD-9 MR317—mental retardation the diagnosis that had been specifically ruled out and that the $255,000 education award was specifically intended to remedy.
See Kraemer v. Spitale 26-cv-1962 DC.
The billing records and the court records cannot both be true. Both exist. Both are self-authenticating documents. That documentary contradiction is the evidentiary core of Judge Smith’s and DeRaymond’s Quid Pro Quo robbery.
This phase concluded in 2010 when the corpus of the $255,000 trust was fully liquidated and Emilie’s college matriculation was blocked to fund the Enterprise’s mental retardation employment contractor LEHIGH.
2010 DOJ Official Act: Obstruction
09/21/2010 The victim’s father opened Kraemer v. Pennsylvania 10-cv-4868 to expose this larceny. U.S. Department of Justice assistant attorney Charles L. Rombeau made an appearance for Lehigh’s Director Freya Kroger, the recipient of the corpus of the corrupt $255,000 payment initiated by Judge Ed Smith’s corrupt official act facilitated by DeRaymond, two Federal guardians, one State guardian and three other Northampton County Judges. The DOJ suppressed Lehigh’s use of ruled out ICD-9 MR317—approved then concealed by Judge Smith—as part of a second quid pro quo scheme.
The official criminal act of obstruction by the DOJ signaled to every coconspirator defendant in 10-cv-4868 (All three guardians and PA AG Linda Kelly) to also suppress their use of ICD-9 MR317 used for the $255,000 robbery and trafficking of Emilie Kraemer turning them into a federally protected RICO enterprise.
09/15/2011 Dismissal With Prejudice 10-cv-4868. Federal Judge William Martini “He believes that though, he claims, Emilie was originally diagnosed as having Asperger’s Syndrome, a conspiracy made up of some of the defendants changed her diagnosis to mental retardation in order to funnel money to private organizations that specialize in the treatment of such individuals.” Doc. 122.
Today, the ‘theory’ Judge Martini described—after sealing the books on the DOJ’s obstruction—is a documented forensic certainty.
Phase II: The Extortion and Repayment (2011–2015)
The DOJ’s Official Act of concealing Judge Smith’s criminality allowed him to pursue his 2011 Federal Judge application and effectively approved the continued quid pro quo use of his public office to obtain his Federal Judge appointment. Judge Smith was free to use the power of his public office to leverage the Phase I debt to induce the re-appointment of defendant Lisa Spitale as Limited Permanent Guardian with sole discretion over Emilie’s general care, maintenance, and custody pursuant to 20 Pa. C.S. § 5512.1(b).
Four private ex parte hearings were arranged by DeRaymond before his former law partner Judge Smith, each producing a formal judicial act within the meaning of McDonnell v. United States, 579 U.S. 550 (2016), two timed to Smith’s Federal judge application.
Meeting 1. 05/12/2006 DeRaymond applied for total custody of Emilie immediately after Plaintiff won $200,000 in Administrative Proceeding No. 5779 05/06.
Meeting 2. 12/21/2006 Official Act—the QUID: DeRaymond obtained Smith’s corrupt guardian appointment Order the same afternoon Federal Judge Pratter convened a settlement conference to enforce Plaintiff’s $255,000 education award.
2011 DOJ intervention and obstruction 10-cv-4868
Meeting 3. 07/15/2011 Official Act—Quid Pro Quo: DeRaymond arranged coconspirator Spitale’s reappointment before Smith as Smith formally applied for Federal judge.
Meeting 4. 03/23/2012 Spitale petitioned Smith for Special Relief increasing Emilie’s time with LEHIGH —who received the corpus of the corrupt payment from plaintiff’s $255,000 trust he obtained for his daughter—initiating the violent payment sequence.
The payments not due to Judge Smith were violent acts in aid of racketeering proscribed by 18 U.S.C. § 1959 delivered through guardian Lisa Spitale’s (no show) guardian authority, and LEHIGH [ the recipient of the corpus of the $255,000 corrupt payment protected by the DOJ ] timed to Judge Smith’s Federal nomination milestones with documentary precision.
Under the No-Show Job precedent established in the United States v. Skelos, 707 F. App’x 30 (2d Cir. 2017) and United States v. Silver, 864 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 2017), “intangible property of quantifiable market value” Spitale’s no show appointment was the mechanical instrument of extortion—compensation not for legitimate guardianship but for a violent witness suppression and silence detail to clear Judge Smith’s path through the FBI vetting process created by the DOJ resulting in the transferable asset: the liquid income and power of Judge Smith’s new job as Federal judge procured through the extortion of the Plaintiff’s right to a fair and honest judicial process.
Payment One: 08/06/2012: Lisa Spitale arranged the torture of Judge Smith’s victim and police protection to conceal it from FBI—the plaintiffs sister, Judge Ed Smith’s close friend Deputy Gretchen Kraemer’s—refused to document, report or arrest Emilie’s torture assailants leaving no police record for FBI.
Payment Two: 04/29/2013 Attempted Murder. Norwegian Scabies deliberately cultivated through sequential immunosuppressant prescriptions under a false Eczema diagnosis—placed into strategic remission six days before Smith’s 08/01/2013 Presidential nomination and re-cultivated six days after, nearly killing the victim until the Plaintiff intervened from New York;
Payment Three: 03/27/2014 Pharmacological maiming via Risperidone doubled on the day after Smith’s Federal Judge appointment—successfully incapacitating the witness/victim after the failed 2013 attempted murder, finalizing the Enterprise’s security at the moment Smith acquired Article III immunity as Federal Judge for Northampton County PA;
Payment Four: 08/17/2014 kidnapping of my daughter Emilie Kraemer on—the final extortion payment— delivered 144 days after Smith took the Federal bench to permanently insulate the Enterprise from disclosure. Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255, 268 (1992).
A sitting Article III judge receiving professional services as the final payment in an extortion scheme he initiated as a state court judge satisfies the interstate commerce requirement of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962; §1951 at the highest possible level.
Lisa Spitale’s No-Show Job as Transferable Property
In the Second Circuit, property under the Hobbs Act includes intangible rights and future economic interests. Lisa Spitale, by not showing up for her duties as guardian after directing Smith’s victim, Emilie to Lehigh—the recipient of the corpus of the corrupt payment from Emilie’s $255,000 trust—was pummeled by them, Spitale and the Enterprise provided Smith with the ultimate thing of value: a clear path to a lifetime Federal Appointment (Article III).
The Exchange: Smith provided the Official Act (the 2006 robbery) which liquidated the plaintiff’s $255,000 for the Enterprise.
The Repayment: In 2011, Spitale accepted the no-show guardian appointment—where her actual “work” was not guardianship, but the violence-for-hire (cigarette burns, Norwegian scabies, pharmacological maiming) required to ensure Smith’s clean Federal vetting after the DOJ obstructed evidence of Judge Smith 12/21/2006 use of his public office for robbery and trafficking.
The Transferable Asset: The value obtained by Smith was the liquid income and power of his new Federal Judgeship, which was only attainable because the Enterprise effectively bought the victim’s silence using the stolen $255,000. United States v. Skelos 707 F. App’x 30 (2d Cir. 2017); United States v. Silver 864 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 2017).
Effect On Interstate Commerce
Poisoning of Federal Infrastructure: The Federal Courts are the primary infrastructure for resolving interstate commercial and legal disputes. By seating a judge beholden to at least FOUR law firms that facilitated this transition, the Enterprise poisoned the federal bench.
— Attorney Ray DeRaymond Esq., 2007 Joined Gross, McGinley LLP. Died 2019;
— State guardian Lisa Spitale Esq. 2005 – 2015 The Law Offices Of Charles W. Gordon;
— Federal guardian Shanon Moore Esq., 2010-2014: Gallagher, Schoenfeld, Surkin, Chupein & DeMis;
— Federal guardian Marcie Romberger Esq., 2007 – 2010 Quit for having a conflict of interest when her husband joined school District’s law firm Sweet, Stevens, Katz & Williams LLP in 2010—the then Romberger herself joined Sweet, Stevens on 07/29/2020.
Judge Smith sat in Article III jurisdiction not as an impartial jurist, but as a permanent shield for the racketeers who maimed his victim the day he took office. By placing a compromised individual into a lifetime Article III seat, the Enterprise obstructed the honest services of the federal government.
What Did the DOJ Get In Exchange For Placing Judge Smith?
2014 and 2023 While Judge Smith sat in Article III jurisdiction, his benefactor—the DOJ, which concealed his quid pro quo robbery facilitation [ highly likely on behalf of the CIA ] —extracted a “Quo.” This was not a single payment; it was the continuous, institutionalized function of Judge Smith as a judicial gatekeeper under the influence and favor of a nameless U.S. DOJ Department Director that sent U.S. Department of Justice assistant attorney Charles L. Rombeau from New Hampshire to conceal Judge Smith’s criminal act.
To that end, there was—and still is—an extreme focus on the containment of their corrupt official act and the protection of their national security asset, Judge Edward Smith. A significant part of that containment was assuring Thomas Kraemer [ myself ] would never have the capacity to reverse-engineer what they did.
They installed an Apple Mobile Device Management system (MDM) running in the background of Kraemer’s business devices with No profile; No enrollment notification; No confirmation. The unauthorized MDM administrator’s organizational account sat above my Apple ID in the device trust hierarchy. The access to my device was subordinated to the DDM administrator’s access. That account administrator then distributed owner-tier credentials to thousands across multiple states who had total screen sharing access, keyboard access, camera access, location access and the ability for Remote Call Control to initiate, answer, or terminate calls routed through my iPhone’s cellular radio; Audio Routing; and Telephony Handover allowing my iPhone to “hand off” an active cellular connection to another device.
They used it to implode my business Kraemer Inc., and sully my reputation.
I did not have the capacity to get at their software until 2026 with the aid of AI which could easily handle the many lines of networking logs required to reveal their smear operation. I ended up writing software that detects this type of exploit. https://www.kraemerinc.com/forensicmonitor/
The Budget Dedicated To My Silence is Substantial
Thomas Kraemer [myself] operates Kraemer Design Inc., a strategic brand consultancy with over two decades serving Fortune 500 clients including IBM, Swatch, PwC, Marsh, and Korn Ferry International.
Between 03/27/2026 and the current date, over 4,000 unique interstate MAC IDs have been forensically captured authenticating to my Apple account under a nefarious Apple Declarative Device Management system (DDM) averaging 45 individual authentications per day against my account using Screen sharing, Keyboard sharing, Camera and Phone access against devices in my immediate proximity ( Within 33 feet – Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) range).
That is not a gang. That is an organizational chart. There is a budget owner who authorized the daily human resource cap of 45 MAC IDs per day. There is a human resources function that recruits, schedules, and reimburses the ground crews. There is a technology administrator who provisions the DDM, maintains the enrollment list, and manages the dispatch logic. There is a contracting function that maintains the security firm relationships. And there is a legal protection layer – law enforcement coordination – that ensures ground crew participants operate with effective immunity during violent acts in aid of racketeering.
How The Operation Works – A Horde Of Crowdsourced Criminal Morons.
Their crowdsourced operation ran from 12/2010 without any hard proof until 03/31/2026. Over 36-day monitoring period the software I wrote captured over 1,630 MAC ID’s [ iPhones and iPads belonging to individuals ] authenticating as owner of Kraemer’s Apple ID account under DDM managment IDS token “BBzlfMIo” deployed by the unauthorized DDM organizational account. That number now stands at 4,000+ different MAC ID’s averaging 45 “ground crew” miscreants per day.
What they have been doing with the access is running a two staged crowdsourced violent witness intimidation program. From 03/27/2026 to 04/04/2026 I captured 1,140 pre-enrolled DDM devices operating exclusively at ranges of up to 300 meters from me as determined by Apple’s 0x4 AWDL beacon. What followed these individual network connections were DDM member convergences to my exact location documented by Apple’s DirectLink bluetooth detection.
1,921 of these fucking retards were captured operating within 33 feet of me always after the outer 300 meter range device picked up my iPhone’s radio signal. There were 680 unique timestamped simultaneous Apple account activations of 3, 4, 7, and as many as 20 devices at a time, all within 33 feet of me (organized crowdsourced stalking), all confirmed via pair verifications and capture of their MAC ID’s ruling out any possibility of naturally occurring MAC address rollover from a single device. That is, the DDM operator was activating my account in batches on crowdsourced devices when they got in range.
The 33 foot range is key. Thats the exact distance limitation by your iPhone’s Bluetooth Low Energy beacon (BLE) needed to engage <direct link > allowing for Screen sharing; Keyboard sharing; and Camera sharing. The screen sharing mechanical warning light was suppressed by flooding of background service requests though network access level (7) [ AcLv Screen (7) ]
As soon a ground crews were in place synchronized “coughing” or non-verbal intimidation tactics by individuals within BLE range would commence. If i typed anything about a defendant cough cough, if i looked for work, cough cough, misspelling, cough cough – very direct, loud and very fake. They had total access to clients work, contact data, proprietary software.
WHO ARE THEY EXACTLY?
Thats the question I have asked the SDNY Federal Court at 500 Pearl Street NY NY to answer via a subpoena to Apple. The Chief Judge never read it, or addressed the merits, dismissed my case the same day it hit the docket. Its on appeal. Not addressing the merits, while allowing organized violence during the pendency of my cases has been a pattern with the NY State and Federal Courts anytime I attempted to get to the bottom of this. However, I have hard evidence of organized violence and stalking now – their obfuscated MAC ID’s cryptographically pair-verified and direct-linked into my account for which Apple has their names, contact and credit card information.
The violations are criminal including: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act; 18 U.S.C. § 2511—Electronic Communications Privacy Act; and RICO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c)(d). THOMAS D. KRAEMER v. JOHN DOE 1 through JOHN DOE 1,630 .
Until I get a ruling all I can tell you is who shows up and the empirically observable organization of it. An array of lawenforment stake holders emerged with budget and access to the MDM including; Security firms; Allied Universal Security, OIC Security; CGI IT. Law enforcement; DOJ personnel; U.S. Capitol Police; NYPD DOI; NYPD IAB; NY Court clerks both Federal and State. The violent business end – the ground crews tend to be Migrants; Union members; the Impoverished; and what appear to be Social services clients instructed by their wards to engage in provocational actions deliberately putting them at risk. They get a legal protection layer from the aforementioned law enforcement coordination – that ensures ground crew participants operate with effective immunity during violent acts in aid of racketeering.
DOJ [ law enforcement ] overlooked Judge Smith’s use of his public office for violent child trafficking and grand larceny and protected his coconspirators in Federal court thus assuring his placement on the EDPA Federal bench. In return law enforcement got Federal Judge Smith’s protection resulting in array of lawenforment stake holders tracking me around. Quid. Pro. Quo.