{"id":25067,"date":"2026-05-09T17:34:22","date_gmt":"2026-05-09T17:34:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/penn-nyrico.com\/?page_id=25067"},"modified":"2026-05-10T04:03:16","modified_gmt":"2026-05-10T04:03:16","slug":"hobbs-act","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/penn-nyrico.com\/?page_id=25067","title":{"rendered":"Hobbs Act"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Timeline of Official Acts vs. Federal Nomination Milestones<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A Pattern of Racketeering, Extortion, and Quid Pro Quo<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>Judge Smith\u2019s Federal Milestones<\/strong><\/td>Official Acts & Extorted Bribe Payments<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/thead>
12\/21\/2006<\/strong><\/td>The Originating Act<\/strong><\/td>Judge Smith conducts an ex parte<\/em> hearing for his former partner\/client. He issues an Order for a guardian appointment while concealing the ruled-out ICD-9 MR317 diagnosis<\/strong> from the record.<\/td><\/tr>
07\/13\/2011<\/strong><\/td>Federal Application Period<\/strong><\/td>Smith presides over a guardianship reappointment for Lisa Spitale (arranged by his former partner) just before formally applying for the Federal bench.<\/td><\/tr>
03\/23\/2012<\/a><\/strong><\/td>Application Processing<\/strong><\/td>Smith grants “Special Relief” to Guardian Spitale, diverting Emilie\u2019s summer vacation from the Plaintiff to enterprise contractor LEHIGH<\/strong>.<\/td><\/tr>
07\/23\/2012<\/a><\/strong><\/td>Vetting Period<\/strong><\/td>ACT OF VIOLENCE:<\/strong>
During the time-frame Smith carved out for LEHIGH, Emilie suffers repeated, documented cigarette burns. Deputy Gretchen Kraemer (Smith\u2019s associate) refuses to investigate, ensuring a “clean” FBI background check.<\/td><\/tr>
02\/06\/2013<\/a><\/strong><\/td>Nomination Pending<\/strong><\/td>THE COERCIVE INSTRUMENT:<\/strong>
Emilie is assaulted in a parking lot by LEHIGH staff; a cigarette is extinguished on her forehead. She is infected with an STD (Scabies).<\/td><\/tr>
08\/01\/2013<\/strong><\/td>OFFICIAL NOMINATION<\/strong><\/td>President Obama formally nominates Edward G. Smith to the U.S. District Court.<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
08\/07\/2013<\/a><\/strong><\/td>Post-Nomination Payment<\/strong><\/td>Six days after the nomination, the enterprise re-arms the weapon: Mother DeRaymond procures high-potency immunosuppressants to cultivate Norwegian Scabies<\/strong> on Emilie.<\/td><\/tr>
08\/12\/2013<\/a><\/strong><\/td>Confirmation Vetting<\/strong><\/td>ATTEMPTED MURDER:<\/strong>
LEHIGH forces Emilie (with open skin fissures and a compromised immune system) to clean animal cages, risking fatal septic shock.<\/td><\/tr>
03\/26\/2014<\/strong><\/td>FEDERAL APPOINTMENT<\/strong><\/td>Edward G. Smith is appointed as a United States District Judge for the Eastern District of PA.<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
03\/27\/2014<\/a><\/strong><\/td>The “Day After” Payment<\/strong><\/td>PHARMACOLOGICAL MAIMING:<\/strong>
One day after Smith’s appointment, the prescription pattern breaks. Emilie is administered a “chemical bomb” (Bupropion\/Risperidone), causing seizures and permanent brain damage.<\/td><\/tr>
08\/17\/2014<\/strong><\/td>Article III Tenure<\/strong><\/td>KIDNAPPING:<\/strong>
144 days into Smith\u2019s federal tenure, Spitale uses her void ab initio<\/em> authority to permanently sever all interstate contact between the Plaintiff and his daughter.<\/td><\/tr>
02\/06\/2015<\/strong><\/td>Continuity of Scheme<\/strong><\/td>Spitale perjures herself before Judge Zito to obtain a permanent no-contact order, converting a violent kidnapping into a court-enforced prohibition.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody>
<\/td><\/td><\/td><\/tr><\/tfoot><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Architecture of Corruption: Four Key Ex Parte Meetings<\/strong>
The Coordination between Attorney Raymond DeRaymond and Judge Edward Smith<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The following four unilateral hearings were arranged by Attorney Raymond DeRaymond before his former law partner and his client Mother DeRaymond, Judge Edward Smith’s former lawyer client. These meetings were the mechanical “engine” of the enterprise, designed first to initiate the robbery of educational funds and later to secure the “payment” of the victim’s permanent silence. McDonnell v. United States<\/em>, 579 U.S. 550 (2016)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Phase I: The Robbery (2006)<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

These meetings were designed to hijack a $255,000 Federal settlement obtained by the Plaintiff and install the enterprises Gatekeeper guardian.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Ex Parte Hearing One: May 12, 2006<\/strong>\n