On September 21, 2010<\/strong>, Thomas Kraemer filed a civil action (Kraemer v. Pennsylvania<\/em>, E.D. Pa. No. 10-cv-4868<\/mark><\/a>) naming 49 defendants, seeking to discover how his daughter\u2019s college fund had been liquidated by a mental retardation employment contractor. The filing of this lawsuit threatened to expose a binary fraud that if the underlying billing forms treating ruled out mental retardation ICD-9 MR317 were subpoenaed they would expose Northampton County PA Judge Edward Smith’s 12\/21\/2006<\/strong> participation in quid pro quo larceny and child trafficking to funnel illegal child business to Special Education Employment Contractor LEHIGH<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This exposure created an immediate national security crisis for the Department of Justice. On 11\/2007<\/strong> the DOJ had enlisted Judge Smith to serve as a Rule of Law Advisor Judge for Task Force 134<\/mark><\/a> at Camp Victory in Baghdad, Iraq, where he adjudicated the detention and enhanced interrogation [torture] conditions of war detainees until 06\/2008 pursuant to the Bush Administration’s 07\/20\/2007 Executive Order 13440<\/mark><\/a> that put the CIA in control of interrogations. 01\/22\/2009 President Obama revoked Executive Order 13440 authorizations of torture. To neutralize this exposure, U.S. Main Justice executed a containment operation.<\/strong> The DOJ under the Obama Administration bypassed regional boundaries and dispatched New Hampshire Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles L. Rombeau to represent LEHIGH’<\/strong>s director Freya Kroger( See 11\/29\/2010 Doc 52; 12\/30\/2010 Doc. 68; 05\/09\/2011 Doc. 107; 10\/21\/2011 Doc. 148). Acting with explicit intent to conceal, Assistant U.S. Attorney Rombeau suppressed LEHIGH\u2019s billing data and historical use of the mental retardation ICD-9 MR317 billing code, offending 18 U.S.C. 1962(d); \u00a7 1512(c)(2); \u00a7 1519; \u00a7 1341; \u00a71343. By withholding these self-authenticating billing records, the DOJ induced U.S. District Judge William Martini to dismiss the action on September 15, 2011, explicitly characterizing Plaintiff’s documented asset diversion as a mere speculative “theory” or \u201cbelief\u201d dismissing his case with prejudice. They also electronically containerized me. <\/strong>An unauthorized Apple Declarative Device Management system (DDM) was covertly installed on my laptop 12\/2010 -three months after I opened 10-cv-4868. I was unable to prove it until 2026 when I used AI to comb through active networking logs to expose the installation and captured it operating in real time. This DDM was used to enroll thousands<\/strong> of devices into my Apple account, belonging to individuals<\/strong> creating a mobile surveillance infrastructure and the coordination of ground crews for violent witness suppression. It’s not a gang, it’s law enforcement and they have a substantial operating budget. Phase I: The $255,000 Robbery (2006\u20132010)<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n On December 21, 2006, Attorney Raymond DeRaymond operating on behalf of the Easton PA School District obtained a corrupt official act from his former law partner Judge Edward Smith\u2014the appointment of a Guardian <\/strong>to treat Plaintiff’s daughter Emilie for mental retardation diagnosis ICD-9 MR317<\/strong>, specifically ruled out by binding State Education Appeals Panel Order No. 1727\u2014in violation of 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 455(b)(2); 20 U.S.C. \u00a7 1415(j); 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 1346; Susquenita School District v. Raelee S.<\/em>, 96 F.3d 78 (3d Cir. 1996); and McDonnell v. United States<\/em>, 579 U.S. 550 (2016). Judge Ed Smith concealed the use of ICD-9 MR317 to approve the order from the Court record. In every courtroom proceeding spanning 9 years, the mother, every State and Federal guardian and District representative told one story: Emilie Kraemer’s diagnosis was PDD-NOS<\/strong> or Asperger’s<\/strong>. On every MH\/MR service billing form approved by the guardians and the mother spanning those same 9 years told a different story: Emilie Kraemer\u2019s diagnosis was ICD-9 MR317<\/strong>\u2014mental retardation the diagnosis that had been specifically ruled out and that the $255,000 education award was specifically intended to remedy. 2010 DOJ Official Act: Obstruction<\/mark>\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n 09\/21\/2010 Kraemer v. Pennsylvania 10-cv-4868 and the<\/strong> U.S. Department of Justice. <\/strong>The victim’s father opened Pennsylvania 10-cv-4868 on behalf of his daughter. U.S. assistant attorney Charles L. Rombeau made an appearance<\/mark><\/a> for Lehigh’s Director Freya Kroger, the recipient of the corpus of the corrupt $255,000 <\/strong>payment initiated by Judge Ed Smith’s corrupt official act facilitated by DeRaymond, two Federal guardians, one State guardian and three other Northampton County Judges. The DOJ suppressed Lehigh’s use of ruled out ICD-9 MR317\u2014approved then concealed by Judge Smith\u2014as part of a second quid pro quo scheme. Phase II: The Extortion and Repayment (2011\u20132015)<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The DOJ’s Official Act of concealing Judge Smith’s criminality allowed him to pursue his 2011 Federal Judge application and effectively approved the continued quid pro quo use of his public office to obtain his Federal Judge appointment. Judge Smith was free to use the power of his public office to leverage the Phase I debt to induce the re-appointment of defendant Lisa Spitale as Limited Permanent Guardian with sole discretion over Emilie’s general care, maintenance, and custody pursuant to 20 Pa. C.S. \u00a7 5512.1(b)<\/mark><\/a>. Payment One: Torture<\/strong>. 08\/06\/2012<\/mark><\/a>: Lisa Spitale arranged the torture<\/strong> of Judge Smith\u2019s victim and police protection to conceal it from FBI\u2014the plaintiffs sister, Judge Ed Smith\u2019s close friend Deputy Gretchen Kraemer\u2019s\u2014refused to document<\/mark><\/a>, report or arrest Emilie\u2019s torture assailants leaving no police record for FBI. A sitting Article III judge receiving professional services as the final payment in an extortion scheme he initiated as a state court judge satisfies the interstate commerce requirement of 18 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1962; \u00a71951 at the highest possible level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Lisa Spitale\u2019s No-Show Job as Transferable Property<\/strong> The Exchange:<\/strong> Smith provided the Official Act (the 2006 robbery) which liquidated the plaintiff\u2019s $255,000 for the Enterprise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Repayment:<\/strong> In 2011, Spitale accepted the no-show guardian appointment\u2014where her actual “work” was not guardianship, but the violence-for-hire (cigarette burns, Norwegian scabies, pharmacological maiming) required to ensure Smith\u2019s clean Federal vetting after the DOJ obstructed evidence of Judge Smith 12\/21\/2006 use of his public office for robbery and trafficking. Effect On Interstate Commerce DOJ High-Stakes Damage Control.<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 2014 to 11\/2023 Judge Smith sat in Article III jurisdiction, because his benefactor\u2014the DOJ in 2010 concealed his quid pro quo robbery facilitation. It raises concerning questions regarding Domestic terrorism proscribed by 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2331(5) (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion. When the DOJ Main Justice stepped in to obstruct justice 09\/21\/2010 Kraemer v. Pennsylvania 10-cv-4868 they officially removed Judge Smith criminal obstacles to applying for federal Judge. The Compounding Conspiracy:<\/strong> The DOJ didn’t just overlook a local ethical breach; they actively chose to maintain an unblemished facade for a strategic national security actor. They knew that if the 2010 domestic fraud came to light, it would blow a hole through the legal legitimacy of the theater internment operations in Iraq. Therefore, clearing his path to the federal bench in 2014 was the ultimate method of permanent containment\u2014shrouding him in Article III immunity to keep both the old lie and the new lie permanently under wraps. They treated 10-cv-4868 as a catastrophic public relations exposure point that threatened the integrity of their wartime legal framework. The<\/strong> Budget Dedicated To <\/strong><\/mark>Blunt My Communication\u2014Who Is Paying?<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 12\/2010 I knew someone connected to 10-cv-4868\u2014predicated on what my daughter Emilie was telling\u2014me had access to my work devices. LEHIGH was taking Emilie to meet her “judge friend” in parking lots who was reading my emails\u2014was the story\u2014and Emilie was able to recite business emails they reviewed which gave it credibility. I highly suspected 10-cv-4868 defendants installed an Apple Mobile Device Management system (MDM\/DDM) running in the background of Kraemer’s business devices with No profile; No enrollment notification; No confirmation. I clearly thought it was an MDM and not a two stage reverse shell. It wasn’t until 03\/2026 with the invention of AI that I was able to sort and capture networking logs positively identifying<\/mark><\/a> an enterprise installation of MDM\/DDM on my device and using it daily for screen sharing and tracking. 45 people a day hired to track, vandalize, and assault<\/mark><\/a><\/strong>. 03\/27\/2026 to 05\/02\/2026 the script caught the DDM administrators distributing owner-tier credentials to over 1,630<\/strong> pre-enrolled devices not belonging to Plaintiff, each cryptographically \u201cOwner SameAccountDevice\u201d verified as if they were plaintiff\u2019s own devices. Each unauthorized enrollment was issued by IDS token BBzlfMIo, (a DDM account manager) authenticating devices as owners of Plaintiff’s Apple account.
If Judge Smith were unmasked in open federal court as a domestic child trafficker and larcenist who manipulated medical codes for financial gain, his wartime adjudications would be instantly compromised under international law, human rights treaties, and federal habeas corpus<\/em> petitions, threatening a catastrophic unraveling of the theater internment infrastructure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
To send a U.S. Attorney pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 517 the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder<\/strong> had to authorize it in interests of the United States. If the case touches on broader political, diplomatic, or constitutional issues\u2014which this absolutely does\u2014 Main Justice will coordinate with outside federal agencies like the Department of State. Out of the 49 defendants<\/strong> the DOJ sent an attorney to represent LEHIGH the vendor <\/em>Judge Smith entangled in undisclosed larceny and child trafficking then withheld the core material medical evidence [ ruled out diagnosis code ICD-9 MR317 ] that would have proved child trafficking.
Delaware Assistant U.S. Attorney Patricia C. Hannigan was sent to represent federal Judges Pratter and Rice as was established authority: 28 C.F.R. \u00a7 50.15, grounded in 28 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7 516\u2013517 and \u00a7 509, authorizes DOJ to represent federal employees and officials sued in their individual capacity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Federal Judge William Martini \u201cHe believes that though, he claims, Emilie was originally diagnosed as having Asperger’s Syndrome, a conspiracy made up of some of the defendants changed her diagnosis to mental retardation in order to funnel money to private organizations that specialize in the treatment of such individuals.\u201d<\/em> Doc. 122<\/mark><\/a>.<\/em>
Today, the \u2018theory\u2019 Judge Martini described\u2014after sealing the books on the DOJ’s obstruction\u2014is a documented forensic certainty. <\/mark> Kraemer v. Spitale, D.C. No. 26-cv-1962<\/mark><\/a>
The DOJ ensured the books were sealed permanently insulating the paper trail from public scrutiny. This tactical obstruction achieved its primary institutional objective: it scrubbed Judge Smith’s background check, clearing his path through the FBI vetting process and guaranteeing the viability of his formal application for the federal bench. 2012<\/strong><\/mark><\/a> Judge Smith and his coconspirators, including LEHIGH tortured his victim my daughter to ensure his unfettered path to the federal bench with no interference from the U.S. Attorney General.
08\/01\/2013 <\/strong>The President Obama nominated Judge Smith for Federal Judge. The DOJ\/CIA effectively placed what they knew to be a violent child trafficker on the Federal bench to cover their [ ass ] lack of due diligence from 2007. 08\/26\/2013<\/strong><\/mark><\/a> I stoped my daughter’s attempted murder from a deliberately cultivated lethal disease. 03\/26\/2014 Judge Smith was appointed Federal Judge – the next day 03\/27\/2014<\/strong><\/mark><\/a> my daughter Emilie was overdosed with pharmaceuticals brain damaging her.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ground Crew Log: \u200b https:\/\/kraemerinc.com\/gallery\/index_gallery.html<\/mark><\/a>
Law Enforcement Participation: https:\/\/kraemerinc.com\/govparse<\/mark>\/<\/a>
Organizational Architecture: https:\/\/kraemerinc.com\/ddm<\/mark>\/<\/a>
Surveillance Dashboard: https:\/\/kraemerinc.com\/fmparse\/dashboard.php<\/mark><\/a>
The Federal Courts reaction upon filing these facts has been to delay while local law enforcement ramps up assaults, accidents and threats of future violence during the pendency of proceedings. Federal and State Judges both have routinely ignored documented reports of retaliation, including a hit and run, two attempted murders ( assaults with deadly weapons) specifically as a warning for my requesting discovery. This to the extent there is an appearance the courts are coordinating with lawenforment in fraud upon the Court. Current filings:
Kraemer v. Spitale, D.C. No. 26-cv-1962<\/mark><\/a>
Kraemer v. John Does 1 to 1,630 SDNY No. 26-cv-4436<\/mark><\/a>
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The order<\/mark><\/a> was issued the same day Federal Judge Pratter convened a conference<\/mark><\/a> to enforce the child’s actual PDD-NOS<\/strong> diagnosis, and $255,000<\/strong> award to make up for the education denied her for falsely claiming she was mentally retarded. The false and concealed ICD-9 MR317 claim was used to send business to a local special education contractor (Lehigh) creating a pre-planned jurisdictional bypass to liquidate the child’s $255,000 trust.
Judge Smith’s former client<\/mark><\/a> Mother DeRaymond was brutally abusing Emilie before cognitive assessment placement exams to drop IQ scores, this with the help of the District and the Court of Common pleas that overlooked organized abuse used to steer business to special education contractors and for the windfall of government money that manufacturing mental disabilities brought into the county. The Easton Area School District used students on social services for organized bullying during school hours to encapsulate targeted students in 24\/7 chaos. They were a violent, child trafficking enterprise.
11\/2007\u201306\/2008<\/strong><\/strong> Task Force 134 Bagdad Iraq<\/strong>. Northampton County Judge Ed Smith was enlisted by the DOD\/CIA as a Rule of Law Advisor for the U.S. central detention center Task Force 134<\/mark><\/a> in Bagdad Iraq adjudicating enhanced interrogations [ torture ] of war detainees administered by the CIA pursuant to DOJ guidelines. After serving his country and upon his return to the Northampton County Court of Common Pleas Judge Smith continued the use of his public office for corrupt acts with the additional first hand knowledge of the effects of torture, and coercion on a subject.
2008 – 2010<\/strong> the financial recipients of Judge Smith’s 2006 official corrupt act – the State and Federal guardians who became employed as a result of it – concealed DeRaymond’s treatment of Emilie for ruled out ICD-9 MR317 for the purpose of gaining entrance to the criminal RICO enterprise.
08\/27\/2010<\/mark><\/a> the robbery was completed by federal guardian Shanon Moore who diverted the $255,000 from the child victim’s college fund to mental retardation employment contractor LEHIGH and then enrolled her with the contractor completing the robbery in aid of racketeering, and trafficking proscribed by 18 U.S.C \u00a7 1584. See Kraemer v. Spitale 26-cv-1962 DC<\/mark><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The billing records and the court records cannot both be true.<\/strong> Both exist.<\/strong> Both are self-authenticating documents<\/strong>. That documentary contradiction is the evidentiary core of<\/strong> Judge Smith’s and DeRaymond’s Quid Pro Quo robbery.<\/strong>
This phase concluded in 2010 when the corpus of the $255,000 trust was fully liquidated and Emilie’s college matriculation was blocked to fund the Enterprise’s mental retardation employment contractor LEHIGH.<\/p>\n\n\n
The official criminal act of obstruction by the DOJ signaled to every coconspirator defendant in 10-cv-4868 (All three guardians and PA AG Linda Kelly) to also suppress their use of ICD-9 MR317 used for the $255,000 robbery and trafficking of Emilie Kraemer turning them into a federally protected RICO enterprise.
09\/15\/2011 Dismissal<\/strong> With Prejudice<\/strong> 10-cv-4868<\/strong>. Federal Judge William Martini \u201cHe believes that though, he claims, Emilie was originally diagnosed as having Asperger’s Syndrome, a conspiracy made up of some of the defendants changed her diagnosis to mental retardation in order to funnel money to private organizations that specialize in the treatment of such individuals.\u201d<\/em> Doc. 122<\/mark><\/a>.<\/em>
Today, the \u2018theory\u2019 Judge Martini described\u2014after sealing the books on the DOJ’s obstruction\u2014is a documented forensic certainty. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Four private ex parte hearings were arranged by DeRaymond before his former law partner Judge Smith, each producing a formal judicial act within the meaning of McDonnell v. United States<\/em>, 579 U.S. 550 (2016), two timed to Smith’s Federal judge application.
Meeting 1.<\/strong> 05\/12\/2006<\/strong> DeRaymond applied for total custody of Emilie immediately after Plaintiff won $200,000 in Administrative Proceeding No. 5779 05\/06.
Meeting 2.<\/strong> 12\/21\/2006<\/strong> Official Act\u2014the QUID<\/strong>: DeRaymond obtained Smith’s corrupt guardian appointment Order the same afternoon Federal Judge Pratter convened a settlement conference to enforce Plaintiff’s $255,000 education award.
09\/21\/2011 DOJ Obstruction<\/strong> 10-cv-4868<\/strong><\/mark>
Meeting 3.<\/strong> 07\/15\/2011<\/strong> Official Act\u2014Quid Pro Quo: <\/strong>DeRaymond arranged coconspirator Spitale’s reappointment before Smith as Smith formally applied for Federal judge.
Meeting 4.<\/strong> 03\/23\/2012<\/strong> Spitale petitioned Smith for Special Relief increasing Emilie’s time with LEHIGH \u2014who received the corpus of the corrupt payment from plaintiff\u2019s $255,000 trust he obtained for his daughter\u2014initiating the violent payment sequence.
The payments not due to Judge Smith were violent acts in aid of racketeering proscribed by 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 1959 delivered through guardian Lisa Spitale\u2019s (no show<\/strong>) guardian authority, and LEHIGH [ the recipient of the corpus of the $255,000 corrupt payment protected by the DOJ ] timed to Judge Smith’s Federal nomination milestones with documentary precision.
Under the No-Show Job<\/strong> precedent established in the United States v. Skelos<\/em>, 707 F. App\u2019x 30 (2d Cir. 2017) and United States v. Silver<\/em>, 864 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 2017), \u201cintangible property of quantifiable market value\u201d Spitale\u2019s no show appointment was the mechanical instrument of extortion\u2014compensation not for legitimate guardianship but for a violent witness suppression and silence detail to clear Judge Smith’s path through the FBI vetting process created by the DOJ <\/strong>resulting in the transferable asset: the liquid income and power of Judge Smith\u2019s new job as Federal judge procured through the extortion of the Plaintiff\u2019s right to a fair and honest judicial process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Payment Two<\/strong>: Attempted Murder.<\/strong> 08\/26\/2013<\/mark><\/a> Attempted Murder. Norwegian Scabies deliberately cultivated through sequential immunosuppressant prescriptions under a false Eczema diagnosis\u2014placed into strategic remission six days before Smith\u2019s 08\/01\/2013 Presidential nomination and re-cultivated six days after, nearly killing the victim until the Plaintiff intervened from New York;
Payment Three:<\/strong> Maiming. <\/strong>03\/27\/2014<\/mark><\/a> <\/mark> Pharmacological maiming via Risperidone doubled on the day after Smith’s Federal Judge appointment\u2014successfully incapacitating the witness\/victim after the failed 2013 attempted murder, finalizing the Enterprise’s security at the moment Smith acquired Article III immunity as Federal Judge for Northampton County PA;
Payment Four<\/strong>: Kidnapping.<\/strong> 08\/17\/2014<\/mark><\/a> kidnapping of my daughter Emilie Kraemer\u2014the final extortion payment\u2014 delivered 144 days after Smith took the Federal bench to permanently insulate the Enterprise from disclosure. Evans v. United States<\/em>, 504 U.S. 255, 268 (1992).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In the Second Circuit, property under the Hobbs Act includes intangible rights and future economic interests. Lisa Spitale, by not showing up for her duties as guardian after directing Smith\u2019s victim, Emilie to Lehigh\u2014the recipient of the corpus of the corrupt payment from Emilie\u2019s $255,000 trust\u2014was pummeled by them, Spitale and the Enterprise provided Smith with the ultimate thing of value: a clear path to a lifetime Federal Appointment (Article III).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Transferable Asset:<\/strong> The value obtained by Smith was the liquid income and power of his new Federal Judgeship, which was only attainable because the Enterprise effectively bought the victim\u2019s silence using the stolen $255,000. United States v. Skelos<\/em> 707 F. App’x 30 (2d Cir. 2017); United States v. Silver<\/em> 864 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 2017). <\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/strong>Poisoning of the Federal Infrastructure: The Federal Courts are the primary infrastructure for resolving interstate commercial and personal legal disputes. By seating a judge beholden to at least FOUR law firms that facilitated this transition, the Enterprise poisoned the federal bench.
\u2014 Attorney Ray DeRaymond Esq., 2007 Joined Gross, McGinley LLP. Died 2019;
\u2014 State guardian Lisa Spitale Esq. 2005 – 2015 The Law Offices Of Charles W. Gordon;
\u2014 Federal guardian Shanon Moore Esq., 2010-2014: Gallagher, Schoenfeld, Surkin, Chupein & DeMis;
\u2014 Federal guardian Marcie Romberger Esq., 2007 – 2010 Quit for having a conflict of interest when her husband joined school District’s law firm Sweet, Stevens, Katz & Williams LLP in 2010\u2014the then Romberger herself joined Sweet, Stevens on 07\/29\/2020.
Judge Smith sat in Article III jurisdiction not as an impartial jurist, but as a permanent shield for the racketeers who maimed his victim the day he took office. By placing a compromised individual into a lifetime Article III seat, the Enterprise obstructed the honest services of the federal government. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Judge Smith <\/strong>ha<\/em>d to know the circumstances upon which his successful federal application hinged and clearly knew the 2013 torture, 2013 attempted murder 2014 maiming and 2015 kidnapping of his victim, my daughter in aid of racketeering would never<\/em> get looked into.
The DOJ [ and CIA ] effectively put their “Manchurian candidate” on the federal bench. Why? Because they did not do their due diligence in 2007 before they sent the criminally inclined justice to Bagdad Iraq Task Force 134. Then in 2010 due to my suing 48 defendants in 10-cv-4868 were forced into a highly illegal PR reputation managment campaign:
The Global Fallout Risk:<\/strong> If the 2010 litigation had exposed that a Northampton County judge was actively engaging in domestic quid pro quo schemes, diagnostic manipulation, and financial robbery using his public office, his judicial integrity would have been completely compromised. Because Judge Smith served as a primary Rule of Law advisor adjudicating detentions and enhanced interrogations at Camp Victory Bagdad Iraq, any proof of domestic corruption would have immediately weaponized challenges against his wartime adjudications under international law, human rights treaties, or habeas petitions.
The Mechanism of the New Lie:<\/strong> To insulate the entire Task Force 134 apparatus from a catastrophic loss of credibility, U.S. Main Justice stepped into Kraemer v. Pennsylvania<\/em> to suppress the evidence. The appearance of the Assistant U.S. Attorney to shield the private contractor and bury the diagnostic fraud was the mechanical implementation of that containment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
To that end, there was\u2014and still is<\/strong>\u2014an extreme focus on the containment of their corrupt official act. A part of that was building an electronic container around me.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It imploded my business Kraemer Inc., and sullied my reputation from 2010 to 2015. Kraemer Design Inc., a strategic brand consultancy with over two decades serving Fortune 500 clients including IBM, Swatch, PwC, Marsh, Korn Ferry International, various and sundry law firms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
On 03\/27\/2026, I deployed an automated forensic monitoring script that captured incoming network traffic natively, including \u201cOwner SameAccountDevice\u201d challenge-response sequences, active interface transport flags, and hardware-level MAC addresses broadcast by peer endpoints. It exposed a Apple Declarative Device Management DDM re-installation running in the background of my devices after I changed the password on my Keychain. https:\/\/www.kraemerinc.com\/forensicmonitor\/.<\/mark><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Who are they?<\/strong>
1. <\/strong>Day-to-day screen-sharing mules\u2014ground crews<\/mark><\/a>. They are comprised of the most deniable, disposable, invisible people in society: low income individuals, the elderly, migrants and mistreated social services clients. Mules<\/strong>\u2014used day-to-day to get within 33 feet of BLE bluetooth \/ screen sharing range of me needed for the DDM operators initial screen sharing request to jump from Apple Wireless Direct Link – TT 0x4 AWD via an iPhone or iPad enrolled with the DDM to a TT 0x10 DirectLink providing the steady streaming of my screen. I never ask for screen sharing so they get one of the thousands of devices enrolled in the DDM they enrolled my device in to do it. That’s the operational genius of it and the criminal moral depravity of it.
2.<\/strong> Assault-maiming and government interference crews. A second ground crew comprised of union members, law clerks, emergency medical staff and <\/mark>law-enforcement<\/strong><\/mark><\/a> are used blunt service at retail settings, courts, urgent care facilities, they provide immunity for violent ground crews [ migrants\/contractors ]. They influence improper medical treatment at urgent care facilities resulting from injuries inflicted by the DDM organized ground crews. This is how you get “flushed,” disappeared<\/strong> or killed.<\/strong>
3. <\/strong>Breakdown in The Rule of Law.<\/strong> Not addressing the merits of my cases while allowing organized violence during the pendency of my cases has been a pattern with the NY State and Federal Courts anytime I attempted to get to the bottom of this. The Court’s allowance of reported violence without a meeting during the pendency of my cases invalidates any<\/em> claim preclusion but so far has not been the case. i.e., the Courts have willfully participated in keeping me on this violent, U.S. \/DOJ\/Law-enforcement induced merry-go-round.
DDM Operators-Owners: Allied Universal Security<\/strong><\/mark><\/strong>
Interstate State Lawenforment<\/a> entities NYPD; NYPD DOI; NYPD IAB; OIC Security; NY Court clerks including Federal clerks Northampton County PA Police; NJ County Police have demonstrated direct access to the illegal MDM account. Federal Lawenforment entities: DOJ personnel; U.S. Capitol Police; CGI IT; Armed Security at Federal Courts all managed by Allied Universal Security<\/mark><\/a> have all demonstrated direct access to the MDM account installed on my laptop.
09\/08\/2023<\/strong> Allied Universal was caught operating the illegal DDM installed on my laptop. An Allied Universal Security <\/mark>employee admitted to cough, cough, coughing in corollary to my computer screen activity “as just doing his job<\/mark>.<\/a>” “His boss made him do it.” Thus establishing Allied Universal<\/mark> as the key owner operator of the MDM\/DDM. Allied Universal<\/mark><\/a> has HUGE government security contracts.
The MDM for which law enforcement has access to\u2014managed by Allied Universal Security<\/strong>\u2014is used to dispatch violent ground crews which are protected and receive immunity from law enforcement and private security.
Operational Structure \/ Strategy <\/strong>
The script reveled 1,140 Owner SameAccountDevice, devices operating at ranges at up to 300 meters <\/strong>via Apple Wireless Direct Link – TT 0x4 AWDL – from me that received the initial screen sharing requests from the DDM that consistently preceded TT 0x10 DirectLink convergences operating within <\/strong>Bluetooth BLE range ( 33 feet<\/strong> ) from the plaintiff providing full screen sharing streaming capacity from my laptop (Exhibit G).
There were 1,921 Owner SameAccountDevice, TT 0x10 DirectLink authentications placing unauthorized devices within 33 feet <\/strong>of Plaintiff’s physical location after the initial 300 meter authentications occurred (Exhibit F).
33 Feet<\/strong> is Apple\u2019s laptop Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) broadcast range at which a 0x10 DirectLink connection can occur. It is also the prerequisite connection for Owner SameAccountDevice Screen Sharing<\/strong> to become fully viable. (screen sharing can be used via TT 0x4 AWDL however TT 0x10 DirectLink provides a wider range of services )
The DDM operator\u2014prior to 0x10 DirectLink convergences\u2014pre-staged Screen Sharing services<\/strong> via TT 0x4 AWDL connected ground crews providing limited screen sharing capacity that then gets passed to ground crews operating within BLE range [33 feet of the plaintiff] for full streaming capacity.\u00a0 The DDM operator cannot easily\/reliably view my screen directly without the assistance of ground crews sitting within BLE range Exhibit L<\/a>.
The ground crew mules had one job:<\/strong> show up within 33 feet of BLE DirectLink range and sit down, so my screen sharing would become fully streamable to the DDM\u2019s operators along with other services such as keyboard sharing. The DDM sets the table. Miscreants (mules) requiring no expertise sit down for dinner while their devices provided the bluetooth connection for the DDM operator to see my laptop\u2019s screen, camera, or provide keyboard access uninterrupted.
The violent<\/strong> ground<\/strong> crews <\/strong>inflict injuries, specifically the transference of staph infection<\/strong>, and subsequent intimidation to treatment at Urgent Care medical centers guarded by Allied Universal. Fall asleep in your car Allied provides cover for teams to shove a medical grade articulated endoscope through door cracks and into your mouth, to inject infection, and break crowns. The ground crews <\/strong>also put on staged skits via – provocations, structured by Allied Security allowing them to reach out to local lawenforment over “concerns” which they engineer. e.g., no calls to the police for my maiming, those calls occur when you interfere with their ground crew’s 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 1959 offenses. Very sophisticated, very practiced. State rest stops are Allied’s prime targets for maiming and vandalism in aid of racketeering. Basically they re-package your personal brand so you can be ignored and erased. Cough, cough, cough!!<\/mark><\/a>
Substantial Budget\u2014Someone is Paying Allied Universal.<\/mark><\/strong> The human resources function is substantial. It recruits, schedules, and reimburses ground crews; There is a technology administrator who provisions the DDM, maintains the enrollment list, and manages the dispatch logic. There is a contracting function that maintains the security firm relationships. And there is a legal protection layer – law enforcement coordination – that ensures ground crew participants operate with effective immunity during violent acts in aid of racketeering. The “slush fund” paying for this, the end game to effectively erase me from existence – points directly the the DOJ’s initial obstruction and the U.S. retention of their primary security contractor Allied Universal Security.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/mark>Sources<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
<\/li>\n\n\n\n
Theater Internment Facility processing, Geneva Convention IV compliance. Page 105 Interrogation. Interrogation Operations. Task Force 134 controlled U.S. detainee operations in Iraq.